daffodils: questions

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bulb
Weight: 0.50
, flower
Weight: 0.49
, perennial
Weight: 0.45
, narcissus
Weight: 0.36
Siblings crocus
Weight: 0.34
, hydrangea
Weight: 0.34
, daffodil
Weight: 0.34
, tulip
Weight: 0.33
, aster
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
questions 1.00
has quality questions 0.92
question 0.88
has quality question 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(daffodils, questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(daffodils, questions)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(daffodils, questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(daffodils, has quality questions)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(daffodils, questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(daffodils, question)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(daffodils, questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(daffodils, has quality questions)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(daffodils, questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(daffodils, has quality questions)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(daffodils, questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(daffodils, question)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(daffodils, questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(daffodils, question)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(daffodils, questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(daffodils, question)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(daffodils, questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(daffodils, has quality question)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(daffodils, questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(daffodils, has quality question)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(daffodils, questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(daffodils, has quality questions)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(daffodils, questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(daffodils, has quality question)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(daffodils, questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(daffodils, has quality question)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(daffodils, questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(daffodils, questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(daffodils, questions)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(daffodils, questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(daffodils, questions)