daffodils: have leaves

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bulb
Weight: 0.50
, flower
Weight: 0.49
, perennial
Weight: 0.45
, narcissus
Weight: 0.36
Siblings crocus
Weight: 0.34
, hydrangea
Weight: 0.34
, daffodil
Weight: 0.34
, tulip
Weight: 0.33
, aster
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
have leaves 1.00
have modified leaves 0.84
leaves curl 0.81
have modified leaves at base 0.80
have long bendy leaves 0.77
have bendy leaves 0.77
shed leaves in june 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(daffodils, have leaves)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(tulip, have leaves)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(daffodils, have leaves)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(hydrangea, have leaves)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(daffodils, have leaves)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(daffodil, shed leaves in june)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(daffodils, have leaves)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(hydrangea, leaves curl)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(daffodils, have leaves)
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(tulip, have leaves)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(tulip, have leaves)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(daffodils, have leaves)
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(hydrangea, have leaves)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(hydrangea, have leaves)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(daffodils, have leaves)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(hydrangea, leaves curl)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(hydrangea, leaves curl)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(daffodils, have leaves)
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(daffodil, shed leaves in june)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(daffodil, shed leaves in june)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(daffodils, have leaves)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(daffodils, have leaves)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(daffodils, have leaves)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(daffodils, have modified leaves)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(daffodils, have leaves)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(daffodils, have modified leaves)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(daffodils, have leaves)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(daffodils, have modified leaves)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(daffodils, have leaves)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(daffodils, have modified leaves at base)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(daffodils, have leaves)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(daffodils, have modified leaves at base)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(daffodils, have leaves)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(daffodils, have modified leaves at base)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(daffodils, have leaves)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(daffodils, shed leaves in june)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(daffodils, have leaves)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(daffodils, shed leaves in june)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(daffodils, have leaves)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(daffodils, shed leaves in june)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(daffodils, have leaves)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(daffodils, have bendy leaves)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(daffodils, have leaves)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(daffodils, have long bendy leaves)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(daffodils, have leaves)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(daffodils, have bendy leaves)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(daffodils, have leaves)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(daffodils, have modified leaves)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(daffodils, have leaves)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(daffodils, have long bendy leaves)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(daffodils, have leaves)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(daffodils, have modified leaves at base)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(daffodils, have leaves)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(daffodils, have long bendy leaves)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(daffodils, have leaves)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(daffodils, have bendy leaves)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(daffodils, have leaves)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(daffodils, have bendy leaves)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(daffodils, have leaves)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(daffodils, shed leaves in june)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(daffodils, have leaves)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(daffodils, have long bendy leaves)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(daffodils, have leaves)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(daffodils, have leaves)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(daffodils, have leaves)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(daffodils, have leaves)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(daffodils, have leaves)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(daffodils, have leaves)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(tulip, have leaves)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(daffodils, have leaves)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(hydrangea, have leaves)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(daffodils, have leaves)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(hydrangea, leaves curl)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(daffodils, have leaves)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(daffodil, shed leaves in june)