daughter: be with absent fathers affected

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents young woman
Weight: 0.78
, young girl
Weight: 0.76
, girl
Weight: 0.66
, child
Weight: 0.65
Siblings son
Weight: 0.68
, grandmother
Weight: 0.66
, wife
Weight: 0.64
, bride
Weight: 0.61
, kate
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
be with absent fathers affected 1.00
be with absent fathers 0.96
be with absent fathers affected emotionally 0.93
be with fathers affected 0.93
be with fathers 0.85
be with fathers affected emotionally 0.85
need fathers 0.84
fall with fathers 0.84
be close to fathers 0.83
prefer fathers 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(daughter, be with absent fathers affected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(son, need fathers)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(daughter, be with absent fathers affected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(son, need fathers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(son, need fathers)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(daughter, be with absent fathers affected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(daughter, be with absent fathers affected)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(daughter, be with absent fathers affected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(daughter, be with absent fathers)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(daughter, be with absent fathers affected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(daughter, be with absent fathers)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(daughter, be with absent fathers affected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(daughter, be with absent fathers)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(daughter, be with absent fathers affected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(daughter, be with absent fathers affected emotionally)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(daughter, be with absent fathers affected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(daughter, be with absent fathers affected emotionally)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(daughter, be with absent fathers affected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(daughter, be with fathers affected)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(daughter, be with absent fathers affected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(daughter, be with absent fathers affected emotionally)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(daughter, be with absent fathers affected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(daughter, be with fathers affected)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(daughter, be with absent fathers affected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(daughter, be with fathers affected)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(daughter, be with absent fathers affected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(daughter, be with fathers)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(daughter, be with absent fathers affected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(daughter, be with absent fathers)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(daughter, be with absent fathers affected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(daughter, be with fathers)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(daughter, be with absent fathers affected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(daughter, be with fathers)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(daughter, be with absent fathers affected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(daughter, need fathers)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(daughter, be with absent fathers affected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(daughter, be with fathers affected)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(daughter, be with absent fathers affected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(daughter, be with fathers affected emotionally)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(daughter, be with absent fathers affected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(daughter, fall with fathers)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(daughter, be with absent fathers affected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(daughter, need fathers)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(daughter, be with absent fathers affected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(daughter, fall with fathers)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(daughter, be with absent fathers affected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(daughter, prefer fathers)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(daughter, be with absent fathers affected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(daughter, fall with fathers)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(daughter, be with absent fathers affected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(daughter, be with fathers affected emotionally)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(daughter, be with absent fathers affected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(daughter, prefer fathers)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(daughter, be with absent fathers affected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(daughter, be close to fathers)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(daughter, be with absent fathers affected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(daughter, be with absent fathers affected emotionally)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(daughter, be with absent fathers affected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(daughter, prefer fathers)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(daughter, be with absent fathers affected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(daughter, be close to fathers)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(daughter, be with absent fathers affected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(daughter, be with fathers affected emotionally)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(daughter, be with absent fathers affected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(daughter, need fathers)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(daughter, be with absent fathers affected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(daughter, be with fathers)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(daughter, be with absent fathers affected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(daughter, be close to fathers)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(daughter, be with absent fathers affected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(daughter, need fathers)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(daughter, be with absent fathers affected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(daughter, be close to fathers)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(daughter, be with absent fathers affected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(daughter, prefer fathers)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(daughter, be with absent fathers affected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(daughter, fall with fathers)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(daughter, be with absent fathers affected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(daughter, be with fathers affected emotionally)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(daughter, be with absent fathers affected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(daughter, be with absent fathers affected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(daughter, be with absent fathers affected)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(daughter, be with absent fathers affected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(daughter, be with absent fathers affected)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(daughter, be with absent fathers affected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(son, need fathers)