daughter: be with absent fathers affected emotionally

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents young woman
Weight: 0.78
, young girl
Weight: 0.76
, girl
Weight: 0.66
, child
Weight: 0.65
Siblings son
Weight: 0.68
, grandmother
Weight: 0.66
, wife
Weight: 0.64
, bride
Weight: 0.61
, kate
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
be with absent fathers affected emotionally 1.00
be with fathers affected emotionally 0.96
be with absent fathers affected 0.93
be with absent fathers 0.91
be with fathers affected 0.88
be with fathers 0.84
need fathers 0.82
love more fathers 0.82
hate fathers 0.82
love fathers 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(daughter, be with absent fathers affected emotionally) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(son, need fathers)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(daughter, be with absent fathers affected emotionally) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(son, hate fathers)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(daughter, be with absent fathers affected emotionally) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(son, need fathers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(son, need fathers)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(daughter, be with absent fathers affected emotionally) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(son, hate fathers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(son, hate fathers)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(daughter, be with absent fathers affected emotionally) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(daughter, be with absent fathers affected emotionally)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(daughter, be with absent fathers affected emotionally) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(daughter, be with fathers affected emotionally)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(daughter, be with absent fathers affected emotionally) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(daughter, be with fathers affected emotionally)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(daughter, be with absent fathers affected emotionally) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(daughter, be with absent fathers affected)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(daughter, be with absent fathers affected emotionally) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(daughter, be with absent fathers)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(daughter, be with absent fathers affected emotionally) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(daughter, be with absent fathers affected)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(daughter, be with absent fathers affected emotionally) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(daughter, be with absent fathers)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(daughter, be with absent fathers affected emotionally) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(daughter, be with fathers affected emotionally)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(daughter, be with absent fathers affected emotionally) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(daughter, be with absent fathers)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(daughter, be with absent fathers affected emotionally) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(daughter, be with absent fathers affected)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(daughter, be with absent fathers affected emotionally) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(daughter, be with fathers affected)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(daughter, be with absent fathers affected emotionally) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(daughter, be with fathers affected)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(daughter, be with absent fathers affected emotionally) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(daughter, be with fathers)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(daughter, be with absent fathers affected emotionally) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(daughter, be with fathers)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(daughter, be with absent fathers affected emotionally) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(daughter, be with fathers affected emotionally)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(daughter, be with absent fathers affected emotionally) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(daughter, be with fathers)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(daughter, be with absent fathers affected emotionally) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(daughter, hate fathers)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(daughter, be with absent fathers affected emotionally) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(daughter, hate fathers)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(daughter, be with absent fathers affected emotionally) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(daughter, be with fathers affected)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(daughter, be with absent fathers affected emotionally) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(daughter, need fathers)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(daughter, be with absent fathers affected emotionally) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(daughter, hate fathers)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(daughter, be with absent fathers affected emotionally) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(daughter, be with absent fathers affected)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(daughter, be with absent fathers affected emotionally) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(daughter, love more fathers)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(daughter, be with absent fathers affected emotionally) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(daughter, be with absent fathers)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(daughter, be with absent fathers affected emotionally) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(daughter, need fathers)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(daughter, be with absent fathers affected emotionally) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(daughter, love more fathers)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(daughter, be with absent fathers affected emotionally) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(daughter, love fathers)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(daughter, be with absent fathers affected emotionally) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(daughter, love fathers)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(daughter, be with absent fathers affected emotionally) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(daughter, love more fathers)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(daughter, be with absent fathers affected emotionally) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(daughter, be with fathers affected)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(daughter, be with absent fathers affected emotionally) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(daughter, love fathers)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(daughter, be with absent fathers affected emotionally) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(daughter, need fathers)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(daughter, be with absent fathers affected emotionally) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(daughter, be with fathers)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(daughter, be with absent fathers affected emotionally) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(daughter, need fathers)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(daughter, be with absent fathers affected emotionally) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(daughter, hate fathers)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(daughter, be with absent fathers affected emotionally) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(daughter, love more fathers)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(daughter, be with absent fathers affected emotionally) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(daughter, love fathers)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(daughter, be with absent fathers affected emotionally) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(daughter, be with absent fathers affected emotionally) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(daughter, be with absent fathers affected emotionally)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(daughter, be with absent fathers affected emotionally) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(daughter, be with absent fathers affected emotionally)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(daughter, be with absent fathers affected emotionally) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(son, need fathers)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(daughter, be with absent fathers affected emotionally) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(son, hate fathers)