decay: has state first

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents process
Weight: 0.61
, hazard
Weight: 0.56
, problem
Weight: 0.55
, condition
Weight: 0.53
, sign
Weight: 0.52
Siblings beta decay
Weight: 0.57
, tooth decay
Weight: 0.36
, alpha decay
Weight: 0.34
, macular degeneration
Weight: 0.34
, decomposition
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state first 1.00
has time today 0.78
has time now 0.78
has state problem 0.77
is first order process 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(hazard, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(decay, has state first)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(condition, has time today) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(decay, has state first)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(decay, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(condition, has time today)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(decay, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(hazard, has state problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(decay, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(hazard, has state problem)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(decay, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(condition, has time today)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(decay, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(tooth decay, has state problem)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(hazard, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(decay, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(decay, has state first)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(condition, has time today) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(decay, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(decay, has state first)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(decay, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(tooth decay, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(tooth decay, has state problem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(decay, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(decay, has state first)

Similarity expansion

0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(decay, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(decay, is first order process)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(decay, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(decay, is first order process)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(decay, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(decay, is first order process)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(decay, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(decay, is first order process)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(decay, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(decay, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(decay, has state first)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(decay, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(decay, has state first)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(decay, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(condition, has time today)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(decay, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(hazard, has state problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(decay, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(tooth decay, has state problem)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(decay, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(condition, has time today)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(decay, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(hazard, has state problem)