hazard: has state problem

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents condition
Weight: 0.60
, safety
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.57
, topic
Weight: 0.57
Siblings air pollution
Weight: 0.71
, chemical
Weight: 0.66
, asbestos
Weight: 0.66
, smoke
Weight: 0.65
, fire
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state problem 1.00
has state concern 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(hazard, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, has state problem)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(hazard, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(asbestos, has state problem)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(hazard, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(air pollution, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(air pollution, has state problem)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(hazard, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(asbestos, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(asbestos, has state problem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(hazard, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(hazard, has state problem)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(hazard, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(hazard, has state concern)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(hazard, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(hazard, has state concern)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(hazard, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(hazard, has state concern)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(hazard, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(hazard, has state concern)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(hazard, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(hazard, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(hazard, has state problem)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(hazard, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(hazard, has state problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(hazard, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(air pollution, has state problem)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(hazard, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(asbestos, has state problem)