air pollution: has state problem

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents hazard
Weight: 0.71
, problem
Weight: 0.66
, pollution
Weight: 0.66
, concern
Weight: 0.65
Siblings carbon dioxide
Weight: 0.76
, acid rain
Weight: 0.71
, global warming
Weight: 0.65
, cigarette smoking
Weight: 0.65
, dust
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state problem 1.00
be more of problem 0.90
is international problem 0.85
is global problem 0.84
be more of problem for people taking in sport 0.80
be more of problem in industrial areas 0.79
be more of problem for people taking in sports 0.79
be problem in china 0.79
be problem in india 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(hazard, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(air pollution, has state problem)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(pollution, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(air pollution, has state problem)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(air pollution, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(pollution, has state problem)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(air pollution, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(hazard, has state problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(pollution, has state problem)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(hazard, has state problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(acid rain, has state problem)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(acid rain, is international problem)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(global warming, has state problem)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(hazard, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(air pollution, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(air pollution, has state problem)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(pollution, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(air pollution, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(air pollution, has state problem)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(air pollution, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(global warming, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(global warming, has state problem)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(air pollution, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(acid rain, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(acid rain, has state problem)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(air pollution, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(acid rain, is international problem)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(acid rain, is international problem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(air pollution, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(air pollution, has state problem)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(air pollution, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(air pollution, be problem in china)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(air pollution, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(air pollution, be problem in china)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(air pollution, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(air pollution, be more of problem)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(air pollution, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, be problem in china)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(air pollution, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(air pollution, be more of problem)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(air pollution, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(air pollution, be more of problem)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(air pollution, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(air pollution, be problem in china)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(air pollution, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, be more of problem)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(air pollution, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, be problem in india)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(air pollution, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(air pollution, be problem in india)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(air pollution, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(air pollution, be problem in india)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(air pollution, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, is global problem)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(air pollution, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(air pollution, is international problem)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(air pollution, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(air pollution, be problem in india)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(air pollution, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, is international problem)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(air pollution, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(air pollution, is international problem)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(air pollution, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(air pollution, is global problem)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(air pollution, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(air pollution, is international problem)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(air pollution, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(air pollution, is global problem)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(air pollution, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(air pollution, is global problem)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(air pollution, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(air pollution, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, has state problem)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(air pollution, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(air pollution, has state problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(pollution, has state problem)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(hazard, has state problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(global warming, has state problem)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(acid rain, has state problem)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, has state problem)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(acid rain, is international problem)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(air pollution, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(pollution, has state problem)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(air pollution, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(hazard, has state problem)