global warming: has state problem

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents crisis
Weight: 0.71
, technology
Weight: 0.66
, air pollution
Weight: 0.65
, catastrophe
Weight: 0.65
Siblings nuclear war
Weight: 0.65
, arctic
Weight: 0.51
, carbon dioxide
Weight: 0.33
, overpopulation
Weight: 0.33
, computer science
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state problem 1.00
is worldwide problem 0.80
is issue 0.78
be concern for some 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(air pollution, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(global warming, has state problem)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(technology, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(global warming, has state problem)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(global warming, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(technology, has state problem)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(global warming, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(air pollution, has state problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.54
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(global warming, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(technology, has state problem)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(global warming, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, has state problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(global warming, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, has state problem)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(global warming, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is issue)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(air pollution, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(global warming, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(global warming, has state problem)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(technology, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(global warming, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(global warming, has state problem)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(global warming, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(overpopulation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, has state problem)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(global warming, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(overpopulation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is issue)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(global warming, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(global warming, has state problem)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(global warming, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(global warming, is issue)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(global warming, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(global warming, is issue)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(global warming, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(global warming, is issue)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(global warming, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(global warming, is issue)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(global warming, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(global warming, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(global warming, has state problem)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(global warming, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(global warming, has state problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(global warming, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(technology, has state problem)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(global warming, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(air pollution, has state problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(global warming, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is issue)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(global warming, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(overpopulation, has state problem)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(global warming, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(technology, has state problem)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(global warming, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(air pollution, has state problem)