global warming: is issue

Related concepts

Parents	crisis Weight: 0.71 , technology Weight: 0.66 , air pollution Weight: 0.65 , catastrophe Weight: 0.65
Siblings	nuclear war Weight: 0.65 , arctic Weight: 0.51 , carbon dioxide Weight: 0.33 , overpopulation Weight: 0.33 , computer science Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property	Similarity
is issue	1.00
has state problem	0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.49

Plausible(air pollution, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Typical(global warming, is issue)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.07

Plausible(technology, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Typical(global warming, is issue)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.24

Plausible(global warming, is issue) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Plausible(technology, has state problem)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.24

Plausible(global warming, is issue) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Plausible(air pollution, has state problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(global warming, is issue) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Remarkable(technology, has state problem)

0.23

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(global warming, is issue) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Remarkable(air pollution, has state problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(global warming, is issue) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, has state problem)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(global warming, is issue) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is issue)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.49

Plausible(air pollution, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

Remarkable(global warming, is issue) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Plausible(global warming, is issue)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.07

Plausible(technology, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

Remarkable(global warming, is issue) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Plausible(global warming, is issue)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.24

Plausible(global warming, is issue) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

Remarkable(overpopulation, is issue) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is issue)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.24

Plausible(global warming, is issue) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

Remarkable(overpopulation, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Plausible(overpopulation, has state problem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.24

Plausible(global warming, is issue) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Salient(global warming, is issue)

Similarity expansion

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.99

Remarkable(global warming, is issue) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(global warming, has state problem)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.04

Typical(global warming, is issue) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Typical(global warming, has state problem)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.24

Plausible(global warming, is issue) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Plausible(global warming, has state problem)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.52

Salient(global warming, is issue) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Salient(global warming, has state problem)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.52

Salient(global warming, is issue) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Typical(global warming, is issue) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(global warming, is issue)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.24

Plausible(global warming, is issue) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Typical(global warming, is issue)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(global warming, is issue) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Typical(technology, has state problem)

0.17

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(global warming, is issue) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Typical(air pollution, has state problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(global warming, is issue) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Typical(overpopulation, is issue)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(global warming, is issue) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Typical(overpopulation, has state problem)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.24

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.04

Typical(global warming, is issue) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Typical(technology, has state problem)

0.17

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.04

Typical(global warming, is issue) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Typical(air pollution, has state problem)