air pollution: is international problem

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents hazard
Weight: 0.71
, problem
Weight: 0.66
, pollution
Weight: 0.66
, concern
Weight: 0.65
Siblings carbon dioxide
Weight: 0.76
, acid rain
Weight: 0.71
, global warming
Weight: 0.65
, cigarette smoking
Weight: 0.65
, dust
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
is international problem 1.00
is global problem 0.89
has state problem 0.85
be more of problem 0.84
is global health concern 0.77
be more of problem for people taking in sport 0.77
be more of problem for people taking in sports 0.76
be problem in india 0.76
be more of problem in industrial areas 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(hazard, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(air pollution, is international problem)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(pollution, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(air pollution, is international problem)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(air pollution, is international problem)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(pollution, has state problem)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(air pollution, is international problem)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(hazard, has state problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, is international problem)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(pollution, has state problem)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, is international problem)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(hazard, has state problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, is international problem)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(acid rain, is international problem)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, is international problem)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(acid rain, has state problem)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, is international problem)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(global warming, has state problem)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(hazard, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(air pollution, is international problem)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(air pollution, is international problem)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(pollution, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(air pollution, is international problem)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(air pollution, is international problem)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(air pollution, is international problem)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(acid rain, is international problem)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(acid rain, is international problem)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(air pollution, is international problem)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(global warming, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(global warming, has state problem)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(air pollution, is international problem)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(acid rain, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(acid rain, has state problem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(air pollution, is international problem)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(air pollution, is international problem)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(air pollution, is international problem)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(air pollution, be more of problem)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(air pollution, is international problem)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(air pollution, be more of problem)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(air pollution, is international problem)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(air pollution, has state problem)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(air pollution, is international problem)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(air pollution, be more of problem)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(air pollution, is international problem)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(air pollution, is global problem)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(air pollution, is international problem)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(air pollution, has state problem)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(air pollution, is international problem)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(air pollution, has state problem)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(air pollution, is international problem)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, is global problem)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(air pollution, is international problem)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(air pollution, is global problem)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(air pollution, is international problem)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(air pollution, be problem in india)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(air pollution, is international problem)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, has state problem)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(air pollution, is international problem)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(air pollution, is global problem)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(air pollution, is international problem)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, be more of problem)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(air pollution, is international problem)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, be problem in india)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(air pollution, is international problem)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(air pollution, be problem in india)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(air pollution, is international problem)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(air pollution, be problem in india)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(air pollution, is international problem)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(air pollution, is international problem)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, is international problem)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(air pollution, is international problem)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(air pollution, is international problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, is international problem)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(pollution, has state problem)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, is international problem)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(hazard, has state problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, is international problem)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(global warming, has state problem)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, is international problem)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(acid rain, is international problem)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, is international problem)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(acid rain, has state problem)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(air pollution, is international problem)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(pollution, has state problem)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(air pollution, is international problem)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(hazard, has state problem)