hazard: has state concern

Related concepts

Parents	condition Weight: 0.60 , safety Weight: 0.59 , thing Weight: 0.57 , topic Weight: 0.57
Siblings	air pollution Weight: 0.71 , chemical Weight: 0.66 , asbestos Weight: 0.66 , smoke Weight: 0.65 , fire Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has state concern	1.00
is universal concern	0.86
has state problem	0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Remarkable(hazard, has state concern) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Remarkable(air pollution, has state problem)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Remarkable(hazard, has state concern) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(asbestos, has state problem)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.39

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.12

Plausible(hazard, has state concern) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

Remarkable(air pollution, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Plausible(air pollution, has state problem)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.12

Plausible(hazard, has state concern) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

Remarkable(asbestos, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Plausible(asbestos, has state problem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.12

Plausible(hazard, has state concern) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Salient(hazard, has state concern)

Similarity expansion

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.20

Remarkable(hazard, has state concern) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Remarkable(hazard, is universal concern)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.15

Salient(hazard, has state concern) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Salient(hazard, is universal concern)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.20

Remarkable(hazard, has state concern) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(hazard, has state problem)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.29

Typical(hazard, has state concern) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Typical(hazard, is universal concern)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.15

Salient(hazard, has state concern) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Salient(hazard, has state problem)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.29

Typical(hazard, has state concern) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Typical(hazard, has state problem)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.12

Plausible(hazard, has state concern) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Plausible(hazard, has state problem)

0.24

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.12

Plausible(hazard, has state concern) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Plausible(hazard, is universal concern)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.15

Salient(hazard, has state concern) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Typical(hazard, has state concern) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Remarkable(hazard, has state concern)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.12

Plausible(hazard, has state concern) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Typical(hazard, has state concern)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Remarkable(hazard, has state concern) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Typical(air pollution, has state problem)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Remarkable(hazard, has state concern) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Typical(asbestos, has state problem)