defense: be great

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents position
Weight: 0.62
, weakness
Weight: 0.61
, defense attorney
Weight: 0.59
, factor
Weight: 0.58
, sector
Weight: 0.58
Siblings offense
Weight: 0.33
, midfield
Weight: 0.33
, aviation
Weight: 0.32
, linebacker
Weight: 0.32
, third base
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be great 1.00
feel good 0.83
has quality good 0.80
is big 0.78
be bad in ultimate 0.77
is best 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(sector, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(defense, be great)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(position, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(defense, be great)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(defense, be great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(position, feel good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(defense, be great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(sector, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(defense, be great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(position, feel good)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(defense, be great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(sector, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(defense, be great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(offense, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(defense, be great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(linebacker, is big)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(position, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(defense, be great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(defense, be great)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(sector, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(defense, be great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(defense, be great)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(defense, be great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(offense, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(offense, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(defense, be great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(linebacker, is big) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(linebacker, is big)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(defense, be great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(defense, be great)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(defense, be great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(defense, be bad in ultimate)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(defense, be great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(defense, be bad in ultimate)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(defense, be great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(defense, be bad in ultimate)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(defense, be great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(defense, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(defense, be great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(defense, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(defense, be great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(defense, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(defense, be great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(defense, be bad in ultimate)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(defense, be great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(defense, is best)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(defense, be great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(defense, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(defense, be great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(defense, is best)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(defense, be great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(defense, is best)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(defense, be great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(defense, is best)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(defense, be great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(defense, be great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(defense, be great)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(defense, be great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(defense, be great)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(defense, be great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(position, feel good)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(defense, be great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(sector, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(defense, be great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(offense, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(defense, be great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(linebacker, is big)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(defense, be great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(position, feel good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(defense, be great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(sector, has quality good)