deflation: is issue

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.58
, risk
Weight: 0.51
, problem
Weight: 0.50
, challenge
Weight: 0.46
Siblings bubble
Weight: 0.32
, inequality
Weight: 0.31
, bubble bath
Weight: 0.31
, hangover
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
is issue 1.00
has state problem 0.78
be problem for economy 0.77
is economic problem 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(deflation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is economic problem)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(deflation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is issue)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(deflation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(inequality, has state problem)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(deflation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(inequality, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(inequality, is issue)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(deflation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(inequality, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(inequality, has state problem)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(deflation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(inequality, is economic problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(inequality, is economic problem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(deflation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(deflation, is issue)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(deflation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(deflation, be problem for economy)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(deflation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(deflation, has state problem)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(deflation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(deflation, is economic problem)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(deflation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(deflation, is economic problem)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(deflation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(deflation, has state problem)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(deflation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(deflation, is economic problem)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(deflation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(deflation, be problem for economy)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(deflation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(deflation, has state problem)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(deflation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(deflation, is economic problem)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(deflation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(deflation, has state problem)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(deflation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(deflation, be problem for economy)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(deflation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(deflation, be problem for economy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(deflation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(deflation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(deflation, is issue)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(deflation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(deflation, is issue)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(deflation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(inequality, is issue)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(deflation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(inequality, has state problem)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(deflation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(inequality, is economic problem)