deflation: has state problem

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.58
, risk
Weight: 0.51
, problem
Weight: 0.50
, challenge
Weight: 0.46
Siblings bubble
Weight: 0.32
, inequality
Weight: 0.31
, bubble bath
Weight: 0.31
, hangover
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state problem 1.00
be problem for economy 0.85
be seen as problem 0.85
has state concern 0.84
is economic problem 0.83
is issue 0.78
be problem in japan 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(deflation, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is economic problem)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(deflation, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(inequality, has state problem)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(deflation, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is issue)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(deflation, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(inequality, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(inequality, has state problem)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(deflation, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(inequality, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(inequality, is economic problem)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(deflation, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(inequality, is issue)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(inequality, is issue)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(deflation, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(deflation, has state problem)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(deflation, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(deflation, be problem for economy)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(deflation, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(deflation, is issue)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(deflation, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(deflation, is economic problem)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(deflation, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(deflation, be seen as problem)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(deflation, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(deflation, has state concern)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(deflation, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(deflation, is economic problem)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(deflation, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(deflation, be problem in japan)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(deflation, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(deflation, be seen as problem)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(deflation, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(deflation, is issue)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(deflation, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(deflation, is issue)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(deflation, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(deflation, be seen as problem)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(deflation, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(deflation, be problem for economy)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(deflation, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(deflation, is economic problem)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(deflation, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(deflation, be problem in japan)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(deflation, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(deflation, is economic problem)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(deflation, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(deflation, be seen as problem)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(deflation, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(deflation, is issue)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(deflation, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(deflation, has state concern)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(deflation, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(deflation, has state concern)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(deflation, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(deflation, has state concern)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(deflation, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(deflation, be problem in japan)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(deflation, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(deflation, be problem for economy)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(deflation, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(deflation, be problem in japan)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(deflation, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(deflation, be problem for economy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(deflation, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(deflation, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(deflation, has state problem)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(deflation, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(deflation, has state problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(deflation, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(inequality, has state problem)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(deflation, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(inequality, is issue)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(deflation, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(inequality, is economic problem)