delinquency: has quality bad

Related concepts

Parents	problem Weight: 0.62 , issue Weight: 0.59 , factor Weight: 0.59 , drug use Weight: 0.57 , topic Weight: 0.55
Siblings	mental health problem Weight: 0.32 , alcoholism Weight: 0.32 , thyroid problem Weight: 0.32 , illiteracy Weight: 0.32 , decline Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has quality bad	1.00
has quality good	0.96
is bad thing	0.79
has quality effects	0.76
has quality definition	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.65

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(drug use, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Typical(delinquency, has quality bad)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(drug use, is bad thing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Typical(delinquency, has quality bad)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.23

Plausible(drug use, has quality effects) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Typical(delinquency, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.03

Plausible(delinquency, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Plausible(drug use, has quality effects)

0.02

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.03

Plausible(delinquency, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Plausible(drug use, is bad thing)

0.01

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.03

Plausible(delinquency, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Plausible(drug use, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.56

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Remarkable(delinquency, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(drug use, has quality bad)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Remarkable(delinquency, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(drug use, is bad thing)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Remarkable(delinquency, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(drug use, has quality effects)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Remarkable(delinquency, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, has quality bad)

0.13

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Remarkable(delinquency, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Remarkable(alcoholism, has quality bad)

0.13

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Remarkable(delinquency, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Remarkable(decline, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(drug use, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

Remarkable(delinquency, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Plausible(delinquency, has quality bad)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(drug use, is bad thing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

Remarkable(delinquency, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Plausible(delinquency, has quality bad)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.23

Plausible(drug use, has quality effects) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

Remarkable(delinquency, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Plausible(delinquency, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.03

Plausible(delinquency, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

Remarkable(illiteracy, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Plausible(illiteracy, has quality bad)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.03

Plausible(delinquency, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

Remarkable(alcoholism, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Plausible(alcoholism, has quality bad)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.03

Plausible(delinquency, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

Remarkable(decline, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Plausible(decline, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.03

Plausible(delinquency, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Salient(delinquency, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.82

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.03

Plausible(delinquency, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.00

¬ Plausible(delinquency, has quality good)

0.81

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.04

Salient(delinquency, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.00

¬ Salient(delinquency, has quality good)

0.81

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.04

Remarkable(delinquency, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.00

¬ Remarkable(delinquency, has quality good)

0.75

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.20

Typical(delinquency, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Typical(delinquency, has quality good)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.03

Plausible(delinquency, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Plausible(delinquency, has quality definition)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.04

Salient(delinquency, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Salient(delinquency, has quality definition)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.04

Remarkable(delinquency, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Remarkable(delinquency, has quality definition)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.20

Typical(delinquency, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Typical(delinquency, has quality definition)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.04

Salient(delinquency, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Typical(delinquency, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Remarkable(delinquency, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.03

Plausible(delinquency, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Typical(delinquency, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.49

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Remarkable(delinquency, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(drug use, has quality bad)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Remarkable(delinquency, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(drug use, is bad thing)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Remarkable(delinquency, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Typical(drug use, has quality effects)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Remarkable(delinquency, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Typical(illiteracy, has quality bad)

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Remarkable(delinquency, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Typical(alcoholism, has quality bad)

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Remarkable(delinquency, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Typical(decline, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.20

Typical(delinquency, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Typical(drug use, has quality effects)

0.13

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.20

Typical(delinquency, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(drug use, is bad thing)

0.12

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.20

Typical(delinquency, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(drug use, has quality bad)