demand: be inversely related to price

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents commodity
Weight: 0.60
, factor
Weight: 0.59
, obstacle
Weight: 0.58
, account
Weight: 0.58
Siblings supply
Weight: 0.34
, consumption
Weight: 0.33
, fuel oil
Weight: 0.32
, gasoline
Weight: 0.32
, decline
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be inversely related to price 1.00
affect price 0.80
be related to future price 0.79
be related to future price of good 0.78
be directly proportional to price 0.78
affect prices 0.78
affect price of product 0.78
be affected by fall in price level 0.77
influence market price 0.77
determine equilium price 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(demand, be inversely related to price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(supply, be directly proportional to price)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(demand, be inversely related to price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(supply, determine equilium price)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(demand, be inversely related to price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(supply, affect price)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(demand, be inversely related to price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(supply, influence market price)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(demand, be inversely related to price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(supply, affect prices)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(demand, be inversely related to price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(supply, affect price of product)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(demand, be inversely related to price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(supply, affect price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(supply, affect price)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(demand, be inversely related to price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(supply, affect prices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(supply, affect prices)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(demand, be inversely related to price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(supply, affect price of product) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(supply, affect price of product)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(demand, be inversely related to price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(supply, influence market price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(supply, influence market price)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(demand, be inversely related to price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(supply, determine equilium price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(supply, determine equilium price)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(demand, be inversely related to price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(supply, be directly proportional to price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(supply, be directly proportional to price)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(demand, be inversely related to price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(demand, be inversely related to price)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(demand, be inversely related to price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(demand, affect price)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(demand, be inversely related to price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(demand, affect price of product)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(demand, be inversely related to price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(demand, affect prices)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(demand, be inversely related to price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(demand, affect price)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(demand, be inversely related to price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(demand, affect prices)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(demand, be inversely related to price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(demand, affect price of product)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(demand, be inversely related to price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(demand, be affected by fall in price level)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(demand, be inversely related to price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(demand, be related to future price of good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(demand, be inversely related to price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(demand, be affected by fall in price level)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(demand, be inversely related to price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(demand, affect price)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(demand, be inversely related to price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(demand, be affected by fall in price level)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(demand, be inversely related to price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(demand, influence market price)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(demand, be inversely related to price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(demand, affect prices)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(demand, be inversely related to price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(demand, determine equilium price)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(demand, be inversely related to price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(demand, be affected by fall in price level)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(demand, be inversely related to price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(demand, determine equilium price)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(demand, be inversely related to price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(demand, be related to future price of good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(demand, be inversely related to price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(demand, affect price of product)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(demand, be inversely related to price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(demand, influence market price)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(demand, be inversely related to price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(demand, determine equilium price)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(demand, be inversely related to price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(demand, be related to future price of good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(demand, be inversely related to price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(demand, be related to future price of good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(demand, be inversely related to price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(demand, determine equilium price)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(demand, be inversely related to price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(demand, influence market price)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(demand, be inversely related to price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(demand, influence market price)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(demand, be inversely related to price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(demand, affect price)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(demand, be inversely related to price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(demand, affect prices)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(demand, be inversely related to price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(demand, affect price of product)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(demand, be inversely related to price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(demand, be inversely related to price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(demand, be inversely related to price)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(demand, be inversely related to price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(demand, be inversely related to price)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(demand, be inversely related to price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(supply, affect price)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(demand, be inversely related to price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(supply, affect prices)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(demand, be inversely related to price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(supply, affect price of product)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(demand, be inversely related to price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(supply, influence market price)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(demand, be inversely related to price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(supply, be directly proportional to price)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(demand, be inversely related to price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(supply, determine equilium price)