demonstration: is good teaching method

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents event
Weight: 0.63
, method
Weight: 0.60
, experience
Weight: 0.60
, activity
Weight: 0.59
Siblings march
Weight: 0.65
, video
Weight: 0.62
, meeting
Weight: 0.62
, noon
Weight: 0.42
, rally
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is good teaching method 1.00
is teaching method 0.98
be important in teaching 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(method, be important in teaching)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(demonstration, is good teaching method)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(experience, be important in teaching)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(demonstration, is good teaching method)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(demonstration, is good teaching method)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(experience, be important in teaching)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(demonstration, is good teaching method)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(method, be important in teaching)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(demonstration, is good teaching method)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(experience, be important in teaching)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(demonstration, is good teaching method)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(method, be important in teaching)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(method, be important in teaching)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(demonstration, is good teaching method)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(demonstration, is good teaching method)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(experience, be important in teaching)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(demonstration, is good teaching method)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(demonstration, is good teaching method)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(demonstration, is good teaching method)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(demonstration, is good teaching method)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(demonstration, is good teaching method)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(demonstration, is teaching method)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(demonstration, is good teaching method)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(demonstration, is teaching method)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(demonstration, is good teaching method)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(demonstration, is teaching method)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(demonstration, is good teaching method)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(demonstration, is teaching method)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(demonstration, is good teaching method)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(demonstration, be important in teaching)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(demonstration, is good teaching method)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(demonstration, be important in teaching)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(demonstration, is good teaching method)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(demonstration, be important in teaching)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(demonstration, is good teaching method)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(demonstration, be important in teaching)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(demonstration, is good teaching method)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(demonstration, is good teaching method)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(demonstration, is good teaching method)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(demonstration, is good teaching method)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(demonstration, is good teaching method)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(demonstration, is good teaching method)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(experience, be important in teaching)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(demonstration, is good teaching method)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(method, be important in teaching)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(demonstration, is good teaching method)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(experience, be important in teaching)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(demonstration, is good teaching method)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(method, be important in teaching)