deodorant: has quality change

Related concepts

Parents	perfume Weight: 0.63 , item Weight: 0.63 , product Weight: 0.62 , substance Weight: 0.59
Siblings	lotion Weight: 0.36 , mouthwash Weight: 0.36 , shampoo Weight: 0.36 , suntan lotion Weight: 0.35 , disposable razor Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has quality change	1.00
has quality good	0.86
has quality better	0.86
has quality bad	0.86
is chemical change	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(perfume, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(deodorant, has quality change)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(deodorant, has quality change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Plausible(perfume, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Remarkable(deodorant, has quality change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(perfume, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Remarkable(deodorant, has quality change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Remarkable(shampoo, has quality bad)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Remarkable(deodorant, has quality change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(mouthwash, has quality bad)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Remarkable(deodorant, has quality change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Remarkable(disposable razor, has quality bad)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Remarkable(deodorant, has quality change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(shampoo, has quality better)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Remarkable(deodorant, has quality change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(mouthwash, has quality good)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Remarkable(deodorant, has quality change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(shampoo, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(perfume, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

Remarkable(deodorant, has quality change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Plausible(deodorant, has quality change)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(deodorant, has quality change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

Remarkable(shampoo, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Plausible(shampoo, has quality good)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(deodorant, has quality change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

Remarkable(shampoo, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Plausible(shampoo, has quality bad)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(deodorant, has quality change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

Remarkable(mouthwash, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Plausible(mouthwash, has quality good)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(deodorant, has quality change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

Remarkable(shampoo, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Plausible(shampoo, has quality better)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(deodorant, has quality change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

Remarkable(disposable razor, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Plausible(disposable razor, has quality bad)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(deodorant, has quality change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

Remarkable(mouthwash, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Plausible(mouthwash, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(deodorant, has quality change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Salient(deodorant, has quality change)

Similarity expansion

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.83

Typical(deodorant, has quality change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(deodorant, has quality bad)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.83

Typical(deodorant, has quality change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(deodorant, has quality better)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.83

Typical(deodorant, has quality change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(deodorant, has quality good)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.83

Typical(deodorant, has quality change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Typical(deodorant, is chemical change)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.74

Salient(deodorant, has quality change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Salient(deodorant, has quality bad)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(deodorant, has quality change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Plausible(deodorant, is chemical change)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(deodorant, has quality change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Plausible(deodorant, has quality bad)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.46

Remarkable(deodorant, has quality change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(deodorant, has quality bad)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.74

Salient(deodorant, has quality change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Salient(deodorant, is chemical change)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(deodorant, has quality change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Plausible(deodorant, has quality better)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.74

Salient(deodorant, has quality change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Salient(deodorant, has quality better)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.74

Salient(deodorant, has quality change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Salient(deodorant, has quality good)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(deodorant, has quality change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Plausible(deodorant, has quality good)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.46

Remarkable(deodorant, has quality change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(deodorant, has quality better)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.46

Remarkable(deodorant, has quality change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Remarkable(deodorant, has quality good)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.46

Remarkable(deodorant, has quality change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(deodorant, is chemical change)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.74

Salient(deodorant, has quality change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(deodorant, has quality change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Remarkable(deodorant, has quality change)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(deodorant, has quality change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(deodorant, has quality change)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Remarkable(deodorant, has quality change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(perfume, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Remarkable(deodorant, has quality change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Typical(shampoo, has quality bad)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Remarkable(deodorant, has quality change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(disposable razor, has quality bad)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Remarkable(deodorant, has quality change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(mouthwash, has quality bad)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Remarkable(deodorant, has quality change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Typical(shampoo, has quality better)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Remarkable(deodorant, has quality change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Typical(shampoo, has quality good)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Remarkable(deodorant, has quality change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Typical(mouthwash, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.83

Typical(deodorant, has quality change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(perfume, has quality good)