design pattern: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents pattern
Weight: 0.78
, design
Weight: 0.69
, thing
Weight: 0.68
, structure
Weight: 0.64
Siblings prototype
Weight: 0.62
, observer
Weight: 0.55
, dao
Weight: 0.43
, chevron
Weight: 0.35
, herringbone
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality questions 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(pattern, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(design pattern, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(design pattern, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(pattern, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(design pattern, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(pattern, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(pattern, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(design pattern, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(design pattern, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(design pattern, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(design pattern, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(design pattern, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(design pattern, has quality questions)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(design pattern, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(design pattern, has quality questions)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(design pattern, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(design pattern, has quality questions)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(design pattern, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(design pattern, has quality questions)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(design pattern, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(design pattern, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(design pattern, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(design pattern, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(design pattern, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(design pattern, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(pattern, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(design pattern, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(pattern, has quality bad)