detergent: be advantageous over soaps

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents chemical
Weight: 0.68
, product
Weight: 0.65
, substance
Weight: 0.65
, liquid
Weight: 0.63
, disinfectant
Weight: 0.62
Siblings shampoo
Weight: 0.60
, sodium lauryl sulphate
Weight: 0.59
, bleach
Weight: 0.37
, liquid water
Weight: 0.36
, acetic acid
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be advantageous over soaps 1.00
be preferred over soaps 0.91
be different from soaps 0.91
be better than soaps 0.90
be superior to soaps 0.90
be more effective than soaps 0.90
be better than soaps in water 0.89
be better than soaps in hard water 0.89
be more effective than soaps in hard water 0.89
be more effective than soaps in water 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(detergent, be advantageous over soaps) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(detergent, be advantageous over soaps)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(detergent, be advantageous over soaps) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(detergent, be different from soaps)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(detergent, be advantageous over soaps) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(detergent, be better than soaps)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(detergent, be advantageous over soaps) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(detergent, be superior to soaps)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(detergent, be advantageous over soaps) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(detergent, be better than soaps in hard water)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(detergent, be advantageous over soaps) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(detergent, be different from soaps)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(detergent, be advantageous over soaps) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(detergent, be better than soaps in hard water)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(detergent, be advantageous over soaps) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(detergent, be different from soaps)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(detergent, be advantageous over soaps) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(detergent, be better than soaps)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(detergent, be advantageous over soaps) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(detergent, be better than soaps)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(detergent, be advantageous over soaps) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(detergent, be superior to soaps)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(detergent, be advantageous over soaps) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(detergent, be better than soaps in hard water)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(detergent, be advantageous over soaps) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(detergent, be superior to soaps)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(detergent, be advantageous over soaps) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(detergent, be better than soaps in hard water)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(detergent, be advantageous over soaps) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(detergent, be superior to soaps)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(detergent, be advantageous over soaps) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(detergent, be better than soaps)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(detergent, be advantageous over soaps) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(detergent, be different from soaps)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(detergent, be advantageous over soaps) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(detergent, be advantageous over soaps) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(detergent, be advantageous over soaps)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(detergent, be advantageous over soaps) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(detergent, be advantageous over soaps)