detergent: be superior to soaps

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents chemical
Weight: 0.68
, product
Weight: 0.65
, substance
Weight: 0.65
, liquid
Weight: 0.63
, disinfectant
Weight: 0.62
Siblings shampoo
Weight: 0.60
, sodium lauryl sulphate
Weight: 0.59
, bleach
Weight: 0.37
, liquid water
Weight: 0.36
, acetic acid
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be superior to soaps 1.00
be better than soaps 0.93
be called soaps 0.92
be called soapless soaps 0.92
be different from soaps 0.92
be better than soaps in water 0.92
be preferred over soaps 0.91
be more effective than soaps 0.90
be better than soaps in hard water 0.90
be advantageous over soaps 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(detergent, be superior to soaps)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(detergent, be superior to soaps)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(detergent, be superior to soaps)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(detergent, be better than soaps)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(detergent, be superior to soaps)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(detergent, be called soaps)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(detergent, be superior to soaps)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(detergent, be different from soaps)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(detergent, be superior to soaps)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(detergent, be called soapless soaps)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(detergent, be superior to soaps)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(detergent, be better than soaps in hard water)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(detergent, be superior to soaps)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(detergent, be advantageous over soaps)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(detergent, be superior to soaps)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(detergent, be called soaps)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(detergent, be superior to soaps)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(detergent, be called soaps)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(detergent, be superior to soaps)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(detergent, be different from soaps)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(detergent, be superior to soaps)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(detergent, be better than soaps in hard water)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(detergent, be superior to soaps)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(detergent, be called soapless soaps)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(detergent, be superior to soaps)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(detergent, be better than soaps)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(detergent, be superior to soaps)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(detergent, be different from soaps)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(detergent, be superior to soaps)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(detergent, be better than soaps)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(detergent, be superior to soaps)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(detergent, be advantageous over soaps)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(detergent, be superior to soaps)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(detergent, be called soapless soaps)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(detergent, be superior to soaps)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(detergent, be better than soaps in hard water)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(detergent, be superior to soaps)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(detergent, be advantageous over soaps)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(detergent, be superior to soaps)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(detergent, be better than soaps in hard water)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(detergent, be superior to soaps)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(detergent, be called soapless soaps)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(detergent, be superior to soaps)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(detergent, be advantageous over soaps)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(detergent, be superior to soaps)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(detergent, be called soaps)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(detergent, be superior to soaps)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(detergent, be better than soaps)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(detergent, be superior to soaps)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(detergent, be different from soaps)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(detergent, be superior to soaps)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(detergent, be superior to soaps)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(detergent, be superior to soaps)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(detergent, be superior to soaps)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(detergent, be superior to soaps)