development: be important for employees

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents concept
Weight: 0.63
, aspect
Weight: 0.60
, step
Weight: 0.60
, process
Weight: 0.60
Siblings acquisition
Weight: 0.69
, artificial intelligence
Weight: 0.64
, discovery
Weight: 0.62
, well
Weight: 0.60
, cell division
Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important for employees 1.00
be important in workplace 0.78
be important for teachers 0.78
be important in business 0.78
be important to business 0.77
be important to company 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(process, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(development, be important for employees)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(aspect, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(development, be important for employees)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(development, be important for employees)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(aspect, be important to business)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(development, be important for employees)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(process, be important in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(development, be important for employees)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(aspect, be important to business)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(development, be important for employees)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(process, be important in business)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(process, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(development, be important for employees)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(development, be important for employees)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(aspect, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(development, be important for employees)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(development, be important for employees)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(development, be important for employees)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(development, be important for employees)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(development, be important for employees)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(development, be important in workplace)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(development, be important for employees)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(development, be important for teachers)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(development, be important for employees)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(development, be important to company)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(development, be important for employees)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(development, be important in workplace)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(development, be important for employees)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(development, be important in workplace)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(development, be important for employees)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(development, be important to company)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(development, be important for employees)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(development, be important to company)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(development, be important for employees)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(development, be important for teachers)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(development, be important for employees)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(development, be important for teachers)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(development, be important for employees)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(development, be important for teachers)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(development, be important for employees)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(development, be important in workplace)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(development, be important for employees)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(development, be important to company)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(development, be important for employees)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(development, be important for employees)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(development, be important for employees)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(development, be important for employees)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(development, be important for employees)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(development, be important for employees)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(aspect, be important to business)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(development, be important for employees)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(process, be important in business)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(development, be important for employees)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(aspect, be important to business)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(development, be important for employees)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(process, be important in business)