dialogue: be important in film

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents strategy
Weight: 0.62
, work
Weight: 0.60
, exchange
Weight: 0.60
, conversation
Weight: 0.59
Siblings discussion
Weight: 0.66
, republic
Weight: 0.59
, parmenides
Weight: 0.48
, framework
Weight: 0.33
, partnership
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in film 1.00
be in pre-1970 's film 0.96
be used in film 0.94
be in movies 0.83
be low in movies 0.79
be quiet in movies 0.78
be important in drama 0.78
be important in story 0.76
be important in narrative 0.75
be important in counselling 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(dialogue, be important in film)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(framework, be important in counselling)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(dialogue, be important in film)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(framework, be important in counselling)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(framework, be important in counselling)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(dialogue, be important in film)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(dialogue, be important in film)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(dialogue, be important in film)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(dialogue, be in pre-1970 's film)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(dialogue, be important in film)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(dialogue, be in pre-1970 's film)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(dialogue, be important in film)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(dialogue, be in pre-1970 's film)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(dialogue, be important in film)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(dialogue, be used in film)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(dialogue, be important in film)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(dialogue, be used in film)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(dialogue, be important in film)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(dialogue, be used in film)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(dialogue, be important in film)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(dialogue, be in pre-1970 's film)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(dialogue, be important in film)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(dialogue, be in movies)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(dialogue, be important in film)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(dialogue, be in movies)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(dialogue, be important in film)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(dialogue, be in movies)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(dialogue, be important in film)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(dialogue, be in movies)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(dialogue, be important in film)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(dialogue, be low in movies)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(dialogue, be important in film)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(dialogue, be low in movies)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(dialogue, be important in film)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(dialogue, be low in movies)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(dialogue, be important in film)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(dialogue, be quiet in movies)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(dialogue, be important in film)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(dialogue, be quiet in movies)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(dialogue, be important in film)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(dialogue, be quiet in movies)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(dialogue, be important in film)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(dialogue, be quiet in movies)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(dialogue, be important in film)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(dialogue, be low in movies)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(dialogue, be important in film)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(dialogue, be important in drama)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(dialogue, be important in film)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(dialogue, be important in drama)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(dialogue, be important in film)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(dialogue, be important in story)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(dialogue, be important in film)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(dialogue, be important in story)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(dialogue, be important in film)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(dialogue, be important in narrative)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(dialogue, be important in film)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(dialogue, be important in narrative)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(dialogue, be important in film)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(dialogue, be used in film)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(dialogue, be important in film)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(dialogue, be important in drama)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(dialogue, be important in film)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(dialogue, be important in story)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(dialogue, be important in film)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(dialogue, be important in narrative)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(dialogue, be important in film)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(dialogue, be important in drama)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(dialogue, be important in film)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(dialogue, be important in story)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(dialogue, be important in film)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(dialogue, be important in narrative)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(dialogue, be important in film)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(dialogue, be important in film)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(dialogue, be important in film)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(dialogue, be important in film)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(dialogue, be important in film)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(dialogue, be important in film)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(framework, be important in counselling)