diamond: be more expensive than sand

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mineral
Weight: 0.70
, commodity
Weight: 0.63
, material
Weight: 0.62
, jewel
Weight: 0.62
Siblings infield
Weight: 0.41
, quartz
Weight: 0.36
, garnet
Weight: 0.35
, emerald
Weight: 0.35
, tungsten
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more expensive than sand 1.00
be expensive 0.83
be very expensive 0.82
be hard than plastic 0.81
cost lot of money 0.77
be hard than glass 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(diamond, be more expensive than sand)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(emerald, be very expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(diamond, be more expensive than sand)
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(emerald, be very expensive)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(emerald, be very expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(diamond, be more expensive than sand)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(diamond, be more expensive than sand)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(diamond, be more expensive than sand)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(diamond, be hard than plastic)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(diamond, be more expensive than sand)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(diamond, be very expensive)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(diamond, be more expensive than sand)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(diamond, be expensive)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(diamond, be more expensive than sand)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(diamond, be hard than plastic)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(diamond, be more expensive than sand)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(diamond, be hard than glass)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(diamond, be more expensive than sand)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(diamond, be more expensive than sand)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(diamond, be more expensive than sand)

Typical implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(diamond, be more expensive than sand)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(diamond, be more expensive than sand)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(diamond, be more expensive than sand)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(emerald, be very expensive)