diet coke: have fizz

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents soft drink
Weight: 0.71
, drink
Weight: 0.69
, diet
Weight: 0.69
, product
Weight: 0.65
Siblings chocolate milk
Weight: 0.36
, coca cola
Weight: 0.36
, alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.36
, soda
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
have fizz 1.00
have most fizz 0.97
have fizz then regular 0.93
have more fizz then regular 0.92
have more fizz than diet pepsi 0.88
is fizzy 0.79
is more fizzy 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(drink, is fizzy)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(diet coke, have fizz)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(soft drink, is fizzy)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(diet coke, have fizz)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(diet coke, have fizz)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(soft drink, is fizzy)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(diet coke, have fizz)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(drink, is fizzy)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, have fizz)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, is fizzy)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, have fizz)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(drink, is fizzy)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, have fizz)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(soda, have fizz)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, have fizz)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(soda, is fizzy)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(drink, is fizzy)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(diet coke, have fizz)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(diet coke, have fizz)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(soft drink, is fizzy)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(diet coke, have fizz)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(diet coke, have fizz)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(diet coke, have fizz)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(soda, have fizz)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(soda, have fizz)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(diet coke, have fizz)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(soda, is fizzy)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(soda, is fizzy)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(diet coke, have fizz)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(diet coke, have fizz)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(diet coke, have fizz)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, have more fizz then regular)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(diet coke, have fizz)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, have most fizz)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(diet coke, have fizz)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, have fizz then regular)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(diet coke, have fizz)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, have more fizz than diet pepsi)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(diet coke, have fizz)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(diet coke, have most fizz)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(diet coke, have fizz)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(diet coke, have fizz)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, have fizz)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(diet coke, have fizz)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(diet coke, have fizz)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, have fizz)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(soft drink, is fizzy)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, have fizz)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(drink, is fizzy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, have fizz)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(soda, have fizz)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, have fizz)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(soda, is fizzy)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(diet coke, have fizz)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(soft drink, is fizzy)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(diet coke, have fizz)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(drink, is fizzy)