diet coke: have most fizz

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents soft drink
Weight: 0.71
, drink
Weight: 0.69
, diet
Weight: 0.69
, product
Weight: 0.65
Siblings chocolate milk
Weight: 0.36
, coca cola
Weight: 0.36
, alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.36
, soda
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
have most fizz 1.00
have fizz 0.97
have more fizz then regular 0.93
have fizz then regular 0.92
have more fizz than diet pepsi 0.88
is more fizzy 0.80
is fizzy 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(drink, is fizzy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(diet coke, have most fizz)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(soft drink, is fizzy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(diet coke, have most fizz)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(diet coke, have most fizz) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(soft drink, is fizzy)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(diet coke, have most fizz) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(drink, is fizzy)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, have most fizz) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, is fizzy)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, have most fizz) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(drink, is fizzy)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, have most fizz) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(soda, have fizz)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, have most fizz) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(soda, is fizzy)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(drink, is fizzy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(diet coke, have most fizz) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(diet coke, have most fizz)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(soft drink, is fizzy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(diet coke, have most fizz) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(diet coke, have most fizz)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(diet coke, have most fizz) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(soda, have fizz) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(soda, have fizz)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(diet coke, have most fizz) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(soda, is fizzy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(soda, is fizzy)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(diet coke, have most fizz) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(diet coke, have most fizz)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(diet coke, have most fizz) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(diet coke, have fizz)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(diet coke, have most fizz) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(diet coke, have fizz)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(diet coke, have most fizz) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(diet coke, have fizz)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(diet coke, have most fizz) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, have more fizz then regular)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(diet coke, have most fizz) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, have fizz)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(diet coke, have most fizz) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(diet coke, have most fizz) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, have most fizz)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(diet coke, have most fizz) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(diet coke, have most fizz)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, have most fizz) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(soft drink, is fizzy)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, have most fizz) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(drink, is fizzy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, have most fizz) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(soda, have fizz)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, have most fizz) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(soda, is fizzy)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(diet coke, have most fizz) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(soft drink, is fizzy)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(diet coke, have most fizz) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(drink, is fizzy)