diet coke: have more fizz than diet pepsi

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents soft drink
Weight: 0.71
, drink
Weight: 0.69
, diet
Weight: 0.69
, product
Weight: 0.65
Siblings chocolate milk
Weight: 0.36
, coca cola
Weight: 0.36
, alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.36
, soda
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
have more fizz than diet pepsi 1.00
have fizz 0.88
have most fizz 0.88
have more fizz then regular 0.88
have fizz then regular 0.86
is diet 0.81
is more fizzy 0.80
have more caffeine 0.78
is fizzy 0.77
make higher geyser than carbonated water 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(drink, is fizzy)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(diet coke, have more fizz than diet pepsi)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(soft drink, is fizzy)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(diet coke, have more fizz than diet pepsi)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(diet coke, have more fizz than diet pepsi)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(soft drink, is fizzy)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(diet coke, have more fizz than diet pepsi)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(drink, is fizzy)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, have more fizz than diet pepsi)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, is fizzy)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, have more fizz than diet pepsi)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(drink, is fizzy)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, have more fizz than diet pepsi)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(soda, have fizz)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, have more fizz than diet pepsi)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(soda, is fizzy)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(drink, is fizzy)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(diet coke, have more fizz than diet pepsi)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(diet coke, have more fizz than diet pepsi)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(soft drink, is fizzy)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(diet coke, have more fizz than diet pepsi)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(diet coke, have more fizz than diet pepsi)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(diet coke, have more fizz than diet pepsi)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(soda, have fizz)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(soda, have fizz)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(diet coke, have more fizz than diet pepsi)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(soda, is fizzy)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(soda, is fizzy)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(diet coke, have more fizz than diet pepsi)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(diet coke, have more fizz than diet pepsi)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(diet coke, have more fizz than diet pepsi)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(diet coke, have fizz)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(diet coke, have more fizz than diet pepsi)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(diet coke, have fizz)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(diet coke, have more fizz than diet pepsi)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(diet coke, have fizz)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(diet coke, have more fizz than diet pepsi)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(diet coke, have most fizz)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(diet coke, have more fizz than diet pepsi)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(diet coke, have most fizz)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(diet coke, have more fizz than diet pepsi)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(diet coke, have most fizz)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(diet coke, have more fizz than diet pepsi)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(diet coke, have more fizz then regular)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(diet coke, have more fizz than diet pepsi)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(diet coke, have fizz then regular)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(diet coke, have more fizz than diet pepsi)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(diet coke, have more fizz then regular)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(diet coke, have more fizz than diet pepsi)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(diet coke, is diet)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(diet coke, have more fizz than diet pepsi)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(diet coke, have fizz then regular)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(diet coke, have more fizz than diet pepsi)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(diet coke, have more fizz then regular)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(diet coke, have more fizz than diet pepsi)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(diet coke, have fizz then regular)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(diet coke, have more fizz than diet pepsi)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(diet coke, is diet)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(diet coke, have more fizz than diet pepsi)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(diet coke, is diet)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(diet coke, have more fizz than diet pepsi)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(diet coke, make higher geyser than carbonated water)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(diet coke, have more fizz than diet pepsi)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(diet coke, make higher geyser than carbonated water)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(diet coke, have more fizz than diet pepsi)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(diet coke, is more fizzy)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(diet coke, have more fizz than diet pepsi)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(diet coke, make higher geyser than carbonated water)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(diet coke, have more fizz than diet pepsi)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(diet coke, is more fizzy)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(diet coke, have more fizz than diet pepsi)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, make higher geyser than carbonated water)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(diet coke, have more fizz than diet pepsi)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(diet coke, is more fizzy)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(diet coke, have more fizz than diet pepsi)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(diet coke, have more caffeine)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(diet coke, have more fizz than diet pepsi)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(diet coke, have more caffeine)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(diet coke, have more fizz than diet pepsi)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, have more fizz then regular)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(diet coke, have more fizz than diet pepsi)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(diet coke, have more caffeine)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(diet coke, have more fizz than diet pepsi)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, have more caffeine)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(diet coke, have more fizz than diet pepsi)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, have fizz)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(diet coke, have more fizz than diet pepsi)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, have fizz then regular)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(diet coke, have more fizz than diet pepsi)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, have most fizz)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(diet coke, have more fizz than diet pepsi)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, is more fizzy)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(diet coke, have more fizz than diet pepsi)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, is diet)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(diet coke, have more fizz than diet pepsi)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(diet coke, have more fizz than diet pepsi)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, have more fizz than diet pepsi)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(diet coke, have more fizz than diet pepsi)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(diet coke, have more fizz than diet pepsi)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, have more fizz than diet pepsi)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(soft drink, is fizzy)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, have more fizz than diet pepsi)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(drink, is fizzy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, have more fizz than diet pepsi)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(soda, have fizz)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, have more fizz than diet pepsi)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(soda, is fizzy)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(diet coke, have more fizz than diet pepsi)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(soft drink, is fizzy)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(diet coke, have more fizz than diet pepsi)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(drink, is fizzy)