diet: be addictive soda

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents strategy
Weight: 0.63
, diabetes
Weight: 0.58
, trait
Weight: 0.58
, aspect
Weight: 0.58
, variable
Weight: 0.57
Siblings taste
Weight: 0.32
, approach
Weight: 0.31
, attitude
Weight: 0.31
, consumption
Weight: 0.31
, flavor
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be addictive soda 1.00
is soda 0.88
be soda diet 0.84
is drinks 0.77
be in drinks 0.77
be different from taste of hot drink 0.76
be different from taste of drink 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(diet, be addictive soda) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(taste, be different from taste of hot drink)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(diet, be addictive soda) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(taste, be in drinks)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(diet, be addictive soda) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(taste, be in drinks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(taste, be in drinks)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(diet, be addictive soda) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(taste, be different from taste of hot drink) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(taste, be different from taste of hot drink)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(diet, be addictive soda) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(diet, be addictive soda)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(diet, be addictive soda) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(diet, is soda)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(diet, be addictive soda) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(diet, is soda)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(diet, be addictive soda) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(diet, is soda)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(diet, be addictive soda) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(diet, is drinks)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(diet, be addictive soda) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(diet, is drinks)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(diet, be addictive soda) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(diet, is soda)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(diet, be addictive soda) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(diet, is drinks)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(diet, be addictive soda) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(diet, is drinks)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(diet, be addictive soda) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(diet, be soda diet)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(diet, be addictive soda) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(diet, be soda diet)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(diet, be addictive soda) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(diet, be soda diet)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(diet, be addictive soda) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(diet, be soda diet)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(diet, be addictive soda) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(diet, be addictive soda) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(diet, be addictive soda)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(diet, be addictive soda) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(diet, be addictive soda)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(diet, be addictive soda) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(taste, be in drinks)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(diet, be addictive soda) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(taste, be different from taste of hot drink)