diet: is drinks

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents strategy
Weight: 0.63
, diabetes
Weight: 0.58
, trait
Weight: 0.58
, aspect
Weight: 0.58
, variable
Weight: 0.57
Siblings taste
Weight: 0.32
, approach
Weight: 0.31
, attitude
Weight: 0.31
, consumption
Weight: 0.31
, flavor
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
is drinks 1.00
be in drinks 0.99
is soda 0.83
be different from taste of drink 0.81
be different from taste of cold drink 0.80
be different from taste of hot drink 0.80
be different from taste of hot cold drink 0.79
be soda diet 0.78
be addictive soda 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(diet, is drinks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(taste, be in drinks)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(diet, is drinks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(taste, be different from taste of cold drink)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(diet, is drinks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(taste, be different from taste of hot drink)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(diet, is drinks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(taste, be different from taste of hot cold drink)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(diet, is drinks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(taste, be in drinks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(taste, be in drinks)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(diet, is drinks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(taste, be different from taste of cold drink) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(taste, be different from taste of cold drink)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(diet, is drinks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(taste, be different from taste of hot cold drink) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(taste, be different from taste of hot cold drink)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(diet, is drinks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(taste, be different from taste of hot drink) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(taste, be different from taste of hot drink)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(diet, is drinks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(diet, is drinks)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(diet, is drinks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(diet, is soda)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(diet, is drinks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(diet, is soda)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(diet, is drinks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(diet, is soda)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(diet, is drinks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(diet, be addictive soda)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(diet, is drinks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(diet, be addictive soda)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(diet, is drinks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(diet, be addictive soda)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(diet, is drinks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(diet, is soda)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(diet, is drinks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(diet, be addictive soda)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(diet, is drinks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(diet, be soda diet)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(diet, is drinks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(diet, be soda diet)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(diet, is drinks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(diet, be soda diet)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(diet, is drinks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(diet, be soda diet)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(diet, is drinks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(diet, is drinks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(diet, is drinks)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(diet, is drinks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(diet, is drinks)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(diet, is drinks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(taste, be in drinks)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(diet, is drinks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(taste, be different from taste of cold drink)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(diet, is drinks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(taste, be different from taste of hot drink)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(diet, is drinks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(taste, be different from taste of hot cold drink)