diet: be soda diet

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents strategy
Weight: 0.63
, diabetes
Weight: 0.58
, trait
Weight: 0.58
, aspect
Weight: 0.58
, variable
Weight: 0.57
Siblings taste
Weight: 0.32
, approach
Weight: 0.31
, attitude
Weight: 0.31
, consumption
Weight: 0.31
, flavor
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be soda diet 1.00
is soda 0.90
be addictive soda 0.84
be better than non vegetarian diet 0.83
relate to vitamin intake 0.80
is drinks 0.78
be in drinks 0.78
be low in carbohydrates 0.78
has fatness fat 0.76
be different from taste of drink 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(diabetes, has fatness fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(diet, be soda diet)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(diet, be soda diet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(diabetes, has fatness fat)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(diet, be soda diet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(diabetes, has fatness fat)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(diet, be soda diet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(taste, be in drinks)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(diet, be soda diet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(consumption, relate to vitamin intake)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(diabetes, has fatness fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(diet, be soda diet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(diet, be soda diet)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(diet, be soda diet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(consumption, relate to vitamin intake) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(consumption, relate to vitamin intake)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(diet, be soda diet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(taste, be in drinks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(taste, be in drinks)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(diet, be soda diet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(diet, be soda diet)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(diet, be soda diet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(diet, is soda)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(diet, be soda diet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(diet, is soda)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(diet, be soda diet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(diet, is soda)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(diet, be soda diet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(diet, is soda)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(diet, be soda diet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(diet, be addictive soda)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(diet, be soda diet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(diet, be addictive soda)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(diet, be soda diet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(diet, be addictive soda)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(diet, be soda diet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(diet, be addictive soda)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(diet, be soda diet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(diet, is drinks)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(diet, be soda diet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(diet, is drinks)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(diet, be soda diet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(diet, is drinks)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(diet, be soda diet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(diet, be better than non vegetarian diet)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(diet, be soda diet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(diet, be low in carbohydrates)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(diet, be soda diet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(diet, is drinks)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(diet, be soda diet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(diet, be low in carbohydrates)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(diet, be soda diet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(diet, be better than non vegetarian diet)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(diet, be soda diet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(diet, be better than non vegetarian diet)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(diet, be soda diet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(diet, be low in carbohydrates)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(diet, be soda diet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(diet, be better than non vegetarian diet)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(diet, be soda diet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(diet, be low in carbohydrates)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(diet, be soda diet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(diet, be soda diet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(diet, be soda diet)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(diet, be soda diet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(diet, be soda diet)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(diet, be soda diet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(diabetes, has fatness fat)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(diet, be soda diet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(taste, be in drinks)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(diet, be soda diet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(consumption, relate to vitamin intake)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(diet, be soda diet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(diabetes, has fatness fat)