diet: be better than non vegetarian diet

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents strategy
Weight: 0.63
, diabetes
Weight: 0.58
, trait
Weight: 0.58
, aspect
Weight: 0.58
, variable
Weight: 0.57
Siblings taste
Weight: 0.32
, approach
Weight: 0.31
, attitude
Weight: 0.31
, consumption
Weight: 0.31
, flavor
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than non vegetarian diet 1.00
is vegan 0.84
be soda diet 0.83
be important for healthy lifestyle 0.80
be low in carbohydrates 0.76
is healthy 0.76
relate to vitamin intake 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(diet, be better than non vegetarian diet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(taste, is vegan)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(diet, be better than non vegetarian diet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(taste, is healthy)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(diet, be better than non vegetarian diet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(consumption, relate to vitamin intake)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(diet, be better than non vegetarian diet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(taste, is vegan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(taste, is vegan)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(diet, be better than non vegetarian diet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(taste, is healthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(taste, is healthy)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(diet, be better than non vegetarian diet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(consumption, relate to vitamin intake) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(consumption, relate to vitamin intake)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(diet, be better than non vegetarian diet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(diet, be better than non vegetarian diet)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(diet, be better than non vegetarian diet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(diet, be soda diet)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(diet, be better than non vegetarian diet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(diet, be soda diet)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(diet, be better than non vegetarian diet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(diet, be soda diet)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(diet, be better than non vegetarian diet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(diet, be important for healthy lifestyle)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(diet, be better than non vegetarian diet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(diet, be important for healthy lifestyle)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(diet, be better than non vegetarian diet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(diet, be important for healthy lifestyle)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(diet, be better than non vegetarian diet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(diet, be low in carbohydrates)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(diet, be better than non vegetarian diet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(diet, is healthy)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(diet, be better than non vegetarian diet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(diet, be low in carbohydrates)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(diet, be better than non vegetarian diet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(diet, is healthy)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(diet, be better than non vegetarian diet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(diet, be low in carbohydrates)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(diet, be better than non vegetarian diet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(diet, is healthy)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(diet, be better than non vegetarian diet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(diet, be soda diet)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(diet, be better than non vegetarian diet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(diet, be important for healthy lifestyle)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(diet, be better than non vegetarian diet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(diet, is healthy)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(diet, be better than non vegetarian diet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(diet, be low in carbohydrates)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(diet, be better than non vegetarian diet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(diet, be better than non vegetarian diet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(diet, be better than non vegetarian diet)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(diet, be better than non vegetarian diet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(diet, be better than non vegetarian diet)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(diet, be better than non vegetarian diet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(consumption, relate to vitamin intake)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(diet, be better than non vegetarian diet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(taste, is vegan)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(diet, be better than non vegetarian diet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(taste, is healthy)