diet: be low in carbohydrates

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents strategy
Weight: 0.63
, diabetes
Weight: 0.58
, trait
Weight: 0.58
, aspect
Weight: 0.58
, variable
Weight: 0.57
Siblings taste
Weight: 0.32
, approach
Weight: 0.31
, attitude
Weight: 0.31
, consumption
Weight: 0.31
, flavor
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be low in carbohydrates 1.00
be high in sugar 0.78
be soda diet 0.78
be better than non vegetarian diet 0.76
be treated with omega-3 fatty acids 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(diabetes, be treated with omega-3 fatty acids)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(diet, be low in carbohydrates)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(diet, be low in carbohydrates)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(diabetes, be treated with omega-3 fatty acids)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(diet, be low in carbohydrates)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(diabetes, be treated with omega-3 fatty acids)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(diabetes, be treated with omega-3 fatty acids)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(diet, be low in carbohydrates)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(diet, be low in carbohydrates)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(diet, be low in carbohydrates)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(diet, be low in carbohydrates)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(diet, be low in carbohydrates)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(diet, be high in sugar)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(diet, be low in carbohydrates)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(diet, be soda diet)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(diet, be low in carbohydrates)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(diet, be better than non vegetarian diet)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(diet, be low in carbohydrates)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(diet, be soda diet)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(diet, be low in carbohydrates)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(diet, be high in sugar)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(diet, be low in carbohydrates)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(diet, be better than non vegetarian diet)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(diet, be low in carbohydrates)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(diet, be soda diet)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(diet, be low in carbohydrates)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(diet, be high in sugar)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(diet, be low in carbohydrates)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(diet, be better than non vegetarian diet)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(diet, be low in carbohydrates)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(diet, be soda diet)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(diet, be low in carbohydrates)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(diet, be high in sugar)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(diet, be low in carbohydrates)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(diet, be better than non vegetarian diet)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(diet, be low in carbohydrates)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(diet, be low in carbohydrates)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(diet, be low in carbohydrates)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(diet, be low in carbohydrates)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(diet, be low in carbohydrates)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(diet, be low in carbohydrates)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(diabetes, be treated with omega-3 fatty acids)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.10
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(diet, be low in carbohydrates)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(diabetes, be treated with omega-3 fatty acids)