diner: afford cheap

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.58
, show
Weight: 0.57
, place
Weight: 0.54
, film
Weight: 0.52
, event
Weight: 0.51
Siblings pizza
Weight: 0.34
, hamburger
Weight: 0.34
, taco bell
Weight: 0.34
, fast food
Weight: 0.33
, deli
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
afford cheap 1.00
is expensive 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(film, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(diner, afford cheap)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(diner, afford cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(film, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(diner, afford cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(film, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(diner, afford cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(deli, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(diner, afford cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(taco bell, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(diner, afford cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(pizza, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(diner, afford cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(fast food, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(film, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(diner, afford cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(diner, afford cheap)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(diner, afford cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(fast food, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(fast food, is expensive)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(diner, afford cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(pizza, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(pizza, is expensive)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(diner, afford cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(taco bell, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(taco bell, is expensive)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(diner, afford cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(deli, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(deli, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(diner, afford cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(diner, afford cheap)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(diner, afford cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(diner, is expensive)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(diner, afford cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(diner, is expensive)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(diner, afford cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(diner, is expensive)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(diner, afford cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(diner, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(diner, afford cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(diner, afford cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(diner, afford cheap)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(diner, afford cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(diner, afford cheap)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(diner, afford cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(film, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(diner, afford cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(fast food, is expensive)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(diner, afford cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(deli, is expensive)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(diner, afford cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(taco bell, is expensive)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(diner, afford cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(pizza, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(diner, afford cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(film, is expensive)