taco bell: is expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.74
, restaurant
Weight: 0.73
, fast food chain
Weight: 0.72
, mexican food
Weight: 0.70
, food chain
Weight: 0.70
Siblings taco
Weight: 0.38
, burrito
Weight: 0.37
, tamale
Weight: 0.37
, mexican restaurant
Weight: 0.37
, italian restaurant
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
is expensive 1.00
is expensive now 0.94
be in iceland expensive 0.83
get lately pricey 0.82
is cheap 0.79
be cheap 0.78
be expensive in norway 0.78
be much more expensive in nyc 0.78
is more efficient 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(restaurant, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(taco bell, is expensive)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(mexican food, is cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(taco bell, is expensive)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(fast food restaurant, is cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(taco bell, is expensive)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(food chain, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(taco bell, is expensive)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(restaurant, be much more expensive in nyc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(taco bell, is expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(taco bell, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(restaurant, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(taco bell, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, is cheap)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(taco bell, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be much more expensive in nyc)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(taco bell, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(mexican food, is cheap)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(taco bell, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(food chain, is more efficient)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(taco bell, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, is expensive)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(taco bell, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be much more expensive in nyc)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(taco bell, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(mexican food, is cheap)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(taco bell, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(food chain, is more efficient)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(taco bell, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, is cheap)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(taco bell, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(taco bell, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(tamale, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(restaurant, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(taco bell, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(taco bell, is expensive)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(mexican food, is cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(taco bell, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(taco bell, is expensive)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(fast food restaurant, is cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(taco bell, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(taco bell, is expensive)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(food chain, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(taco bell, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(taco bell, is expensive)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(restaurant, be much more expensive in nyc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(taco bell, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(taco bell, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(taco bell, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(tamale, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(tamale, is expensive)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(taco bell, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(italian restaurant, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(italian restaurant, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(taco bell, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(taco bell, is expensive)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(taco bell, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(taco bell, is expensive now)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(taco bell, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(taco bell, is expensive now)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(taco bell, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(taco bell, is expensive now)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(taco bell, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(taco bell, get lately pricey)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(taco bell, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(taco bell, get lately pricey)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(taco bell, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(taco bell, get lately pricey)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(taco bell, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(taco bell, is cheap)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(taco bell, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(taco bell, is cheap)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(taco bell, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(taco bell, be cheap)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(taco bell, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(taco bell, be cheap)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(taco bell, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(taco bell, is cheap)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(taco bell, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(taco bell, be cheap)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(taco bell, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(taco bell, is expensive now)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(taco bell, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(taco bell, get lately pricey)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(taco bell, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(taco bell, is cheap)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(taco bell, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(taco bell, be cheap)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(taco bell, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(taco bell, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(taco bell, is expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(taco bell, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(taco bell, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(taco bell, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, is cheap)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(taco bell, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(restaurant, is expensive)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(taco bell, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(food chain, is more efficient)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(taco bell, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(restaurant, be much more expensive in nyc)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(taco bell, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(mexican food, is cheap)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(taco bell, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(tamale, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(taco bell, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(italian restaurant, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(taco bell, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(restaurant, is expensive)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(taco bell, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, is cheap)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(taco bell, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(mexican food, is cheap)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(taco bell, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(restaurant, be much more expensive in nyc)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(taco bell, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(food chain, is more efficient)