diner: is expensive

Related concepts

Parents	fast food restaurant Weight: 0.58 , show Weight: 0.57 , place Weight: 0.54 , film Weight: 0.52 , event Weight: 0.51
Siblings	pizza Weight: 0.34 , hamburger Weight: 0.34 , taco bell Weight: 0.34 , fast food Weight: 0.33 , deli Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property	Similarity
is expensive	1.00
afford cheap	0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.62

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.93

Plausible(film, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(diner, is expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.91

Plausible(diner, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Plausible(film, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(diner, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Remarkable(film, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(diner, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Remarkable(deli, is expensive)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(diner, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(taco bell, is expensive)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(diner, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(pizza, is expensive)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(diner, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(fast food, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.93

Plausible(film, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

Remarkable(diner, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Plausible(diner, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.91

Plausible(diner, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

Remarkable(fast food, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Plausible(fast food, is expensive)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.91

Plausible(diner, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

Remarkable(pizza, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Plausible(pizza, is expensive)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.91

Plausible(diner, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

Remarkable(taco bell, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Plausible(taco bell, is expensive)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.91

Plausible(diner, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

Remarkable(deli, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Plausible(deli, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.91

Plausible(diner, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Salient(diner, is expensive)

Similarity expansion

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.96

Typical(diner, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(diner, afford cheap)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.96

Salient(diner, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Salient(diner, afford cheap)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.91

Plausible(diner, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Plausible(diner, afford cheap)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.57

Remarkable(diner, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(diner, afford cheap)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.96

Salient(diner, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(diner, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(diner, is expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.91

Plausible(diner, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(diner, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(diner, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Typical(film, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(diner, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(fast food, is expensive)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(diner, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(deli, is expensive)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(diner, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(taco bell, is expensive)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(diner, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Typical(pizza, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.96

Typical(diner, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Typical(film, is expensive)