diversity: be business advantage

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents value
Weight: 0.66
, theme
Weight: 0.61
, factor
Weight: 0.61
, thing
Weight: 0.60
, aspect
Weight: 0.60
Siblings fairness
Weight: 0.34
, pluralism
Weight: 0.34
, openness
Weight: 0.34
, integrity
Weight: 0.33
, harmony
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be business advantage 1.00
be good in business 0.79
be good for business 0.79
be important in business 0.78
be important for business 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(value, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(diversity, be business advantage)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(factor, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(diversity, be business advantage)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(diversity, be business advantage)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(factor, be important in business)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(diversity, be business advantage)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(value, be important in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(diversity, be business advantage)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(value, be important in business)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(diversity, be business advantage)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(factor, be important in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(diversity, be business advantage)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(integrity, be important in business)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(diversity, be business advantage)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(fairness, be important in business)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(diversity, be business advantage)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(integrity, be important for business)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(value, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(diversity, be business advantage)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(diversity, be business advantage)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(factor, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(diversity, be business advantage)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(diversity, be business advantage)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(diversity, be business advantage)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(fairness, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(fairness, be important in business)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(diversity, be business advantage)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(integrity, be important for business)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(integrity, be important for business)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(diversity, be business advantage)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(integrity, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(integrity, be important in business)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(diversity, be business advantage)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(diversity, be business advantage)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(diversity, be business advantage)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(diversity, be good in business)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(diversity, be business advantage)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(diversity, be good in business)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(diversity, be business advantage)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(diversity, be good in business)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(diversity, be business advantage)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(diversity, be good for business)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(diversity, be business advantage)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(diversity, be good for business)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(diversity, be business advantage)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(diversity, be important in business)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(diversity, be business advantage)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(diversity, be important in business)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(diversity, be business advantage)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(diversity, be good in business)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(diversity, be business advantage)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(diversity, be good for business)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(diversity, be business advantage)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(diversity, be important for business)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(diversity, be business advantage)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(diversity, be important in business)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(diversity, be business advantage)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(diversity, be good for business)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(diversity, be business advantage)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(diversity, be important for business)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(diversity, be business advantage)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(diversity, be important in business)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(diversity, be business advantage)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(diversity, be important for business)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(diversity, be business advantage)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(diversity, be important for business)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(diversity, be business advantage)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(diversity, be business advantage)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(diversity, be business advantage)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(diversity, be business advantage)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(diversity, be business advantage)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(diversity, be business advantage)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(factor, be important in business)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(diversity, be business advantage)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(value, be important in business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(diversity, be business advantage)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(fairness, be important in business)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(diversity, be business advantage)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(integrity, be important in business)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(diversity, be business advantage)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(integrity, be important for business)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(diversity, be business advantage)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(factor, be important in business)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(diversity, be business advantage)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(value, be important in business)