diversity: be good for business

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents value
Weight: 0.66
, theme
Weight: 0.61
, factor
Weight: 0.61
, thing
Weight: 0.60
, aspect
Weight: 0.60
Siblings fairness
Weight: 0.34
, pluralism
Weight: 0.34
, openness
Weight: 0.34
, integrity
Weight: 0.33
, harmony
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good for business 1.00
be good in business 0.99
be important for business 0.94
be important in business 0.92
make good business sense 0.89
be beneficial for businesses 0.82
be good in community 0.81
has quality good 0.80
be good for society 0.79
be business advantage 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(value, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(diversity, be good for business)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(factor, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(diversity, be good for business)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(diversity, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(factor, be important in business)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(diversity, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(value, be important in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(diversity, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(value, be important in business)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(diversity, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(factor, be important in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(diversity, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(integrity, be important in business)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(diversity, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(fairness, be important in business)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(diversity, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(integrity, be important for business)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(diversity, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(pluralism, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(diversity, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(integrity, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(value, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(diversity, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(diversity, be good for business)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(factor, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(diversity, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(diversity, be good for business)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(diversity, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(integrity, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(integrity, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(diversity, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(fairness, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(fairness, be important in business)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(diversity, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(pluralism, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(pluralism, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(diversity, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(integrity, be important for business)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(integrity, be important for business)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(diversity, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(integrity, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(integrity, be important in business)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(diversity, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(diversity, be good for business)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(diversity, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(diversity, be good in business)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(diversity, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(diversity, be good in business)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(diversity, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(diversity, be good in business)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(diversity, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(diversity, be good in business)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(diversity, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(diversity, make good business sense)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(diversity, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(diversity, make good business sense)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(diversity, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(diversity, make good business sense)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(diversity, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(diversity, make good business sense)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(diversity, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(diversity, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(diversity, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(diversity, be important in business)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(diversity, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(diversity, be important in business)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(diversity, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(diversity, be important for business)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(diversity, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(diversity, be business advantage)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(diversity, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(diversity, be important in business)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(diversity, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(diversity, be important in business)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(diversity, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(diversity, be good in community)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(diversity, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(diversity, be beneficial for businesses)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(diversity, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(diversity, be good for society)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(diversity, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(diversity, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(diversity, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(diversity, be important for business)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(diversity, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(diversity, be business advantage)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(diversity, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(diversity, be good in community)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(diversity, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(diversity, be good for society)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(diversity, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(diversity, be important for business)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(diversity, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(diversity, be beneficial for businesses)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(diversity, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(diversity, be good for society)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(diversity, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(diversity, be business advantage)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(diversity, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(diversity, be good for society)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(diversity, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(diversity, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(diversity, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(diversity, be good in community)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(diversity, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(diversity, be good in community)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(diversity, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(diversity, be business advantage)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(diversity, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(diversity, be important for business)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(diversity, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(diversity, be beneficial for businesses)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(diversity, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(diversity, be beneficial for businesses)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(diversity, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(diversity, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(diversity, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(diversity, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(diversity, be good for business)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(diversity, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(diversity, be good for business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(diversity, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(factor, be important in business)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(diversity, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(value, be important in business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(diversity, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(integrity, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(diversity, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(fairness, be important in business)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(diversity, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(pluralism, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(diversity, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(integrity, be important for business)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(diversity, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(integrity, be important in business)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(diversity, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(factor, be important in business)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(diversity, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(value, be important in business)