dog: has state pet

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mammal
Weight: 0.70
, pet
Weight: 0.69
Siblings beagle
Weight: 0.83
, small dog
Weight: 0.81
, labrador retriever
Weight: 0.81
, cocker spaniel
Weight: 0.80
, dachshund
Weight: 0.77

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state pet 1.00
is pet 0.96
being pet 0.94
make pet 0.94
is better pet 0.93
be best pet have 0.92
is best pet 0.91
getting pet 0.91
has state pets 0.91
make good pet 0.91

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(beagle, has state pets)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(dachshund, has state pets)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(cocker spaniel, has state pets)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(beagle, has state pet)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(beagle, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(beagle, has state pet)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(cocker spaniel, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(cocker spaniel, has state pets)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(dachshund, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(dachshund, has state pets)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(beagle, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(beagle, has state pets)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(dog, has state pet)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(dog, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(dog, has state pets)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(dog, has state pets)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(dog, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, has state pets)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(dog, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, has state pets)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(dog, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, has state pet)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, has state pet)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.01
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.06
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(beagle, has state pets)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.06
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(dachshund, has state pets)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.02
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(cocker spaniel, has state pets)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.02
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(beagle, has state pet)