domain name: has quality prices

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents name
Weight: 0.85
, domain
Weight: 0.76
, web site
Weight: 0.71
, address
Weight: 0.70
Siblings organization
Weight: 0.63
, dot
Weight: 0.54
, prefix
Weight: 0.36
, alias
Weight: 0.36
, username
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality prices 1.00
is different prices 0.93
is quality 0.81
has quality use 0.80
keep up with price 0.79
has quality good 0.78
has quality change 0.76
keep up with rapid price 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(domain, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(domain name, has quality prices)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(web site, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(domain name, has quality prices)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(domain name, has quality prices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(web site, is quality)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(domain name, has quality prices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(domain, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(domain name, has quality prices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(domain, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(domain name, has quality prices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(web site, is quality)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(domain, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(domain name, has quality prices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(domain name, has quality prices)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(web site, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(domain name, has quality prices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(domain name, has quality prices)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(domain name, has quality prices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(domain name, has quality prices)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(domain name, has quality prices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(domain name, is different prices)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(domain name, has quality prices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(domain name, is different prices)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(domain name, has quality prices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(domain name, is different prices)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(domain name, has quality prices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(domain name, is different prices)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(domain name, has quality prices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(domain name, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(domain name, has quality prices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(domain name, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(domain name, has quality prices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(domain name, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(domain name, has quality prices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(domain name, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(domain name, has quality prices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(domain name, has quality prices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(domain name, has quality prices)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(domain name, has quality prices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(domain name, has quality prices)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(domain name, has quality prices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(web site, is quality)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(domain name, has quality prices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(domain, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(domain name, has quality prices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(web site, is quality)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(domain name, has quality prices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(domain, has quality good)