donations: work in germany

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents service
Weight: 0.37
Siblings homeless shelter
Weight: 0.28
, escort service
Weight: 0.28
, postal service
Weight: 0.27
, reimbursement
Weight: 0.27
, service station
Weight: 0.27

Related properties

Property Similarity
work in germany 1.00
be bad in europe 0.82
be bad in france 0.81
be bad in spain 0.80
be in india 0.80
work in london 0.79
be produced in france 0.78
be slow in europe 0.78
move around in england 0.77
be bad in uk 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(service, be produced in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(donations, work in germany)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(service, be bad in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(donations, work in germany)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(service, be bad in europe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(donations, work in germany)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(service, move around in england) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(donations, work in germany)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(service, be bad in spain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(donations, work in germany)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(service, be slow in europe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(donations, work in germany)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(service, be bad in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(donations, work in germany)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(donations, work in germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(service, be bad in europe)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(donations, work in germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(service, be bad in spain)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(donations, work in germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(service, be bad in france)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(donations, work in germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(service, be bad in uk)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(donations, work in germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(service, be slow in europe)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(donations, work in germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(service, move around in england)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(donations, work in germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(service, be produced in france)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(donations, work in germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(service, be bad in spain)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(donations, work in germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(service, be bad in europe)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(donations, work in germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(service, be bad in france)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(donations, work in germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(service, be bad in uk)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(donations, work in germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(service, be produced in france)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(donations, work in germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(service, move around in england)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(donations, work in germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(service, be slow in europe)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(donations, work in germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(homeless shelter, work in london)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(service, be produced in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(donations, work in germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(donations, work in germany)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(service, be bad in europe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(donations, work in germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(donations, work in germany)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(service, be bad in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(donations, work in germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(donations, work in germany)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(service, be bad in spain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(donations, work in germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(donations, work in germany)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(service, move around in england) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(donations, work in germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(donations, work in germany)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(service, be slow in europe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(donations, work in germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(donations, work in germany)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(service, be bad in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(donations, work in germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(donations, work in germany)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(donations, work in germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(homeless shelter, work in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(homeless shelter, work in london)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(donations, work in germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(donations, work in germany)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(donations, work in germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(donations, work in germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(donations, work in germany)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(donations, work in germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(donations, work in germany)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(donations, work in germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(service, be bad in europe)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(donations, work in germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(service, be slow in europe)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(donations, work in germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(service, be bad in france)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(donations, work in germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(service, move around in england)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(donations, work in germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(service, be bad in spain)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(donations, work in germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(service, be bad in uk)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(donations, work in germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(service, be produced in france)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(donations, work in germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(homeless shelter, work in london)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(donations, work in germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(service, be bad in europe)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(donations, work in germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(service, be bad in france)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(donations, work in germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(service, be bad in spain)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(donations, work in germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(service, be slow in europe)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(donations, work in germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(service, move around in england)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(donations, work in germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(service, be bad in uk)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(donations, work in germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(service, be produced in france)