donut: has physical part hole

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents item
Weight: 0.58
, snack
Weight: 0.57
, thing
Weight: 0.55
, bad food
Weight: 0.55
, junk food
Weight: 0.54
Siblings pretzel
Weight: 0.35
, sandwich
Weight: 0.35
, muffin
Weight: 0.35
, chocolate cake
Weight: 0.35
, bagel
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part hole 1.00
has physical part holes 0.95
be has hole 0.93
have hole in middle 0.89
be created with hole 0.88
have in holes 0.86
be with holes 0.86
have holes in center 0.85
have holes in middle 0.85
be made with holes 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(donut, has physical part hole)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(bagel, has physical part hole)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(donut, has physical part hole)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(bagel, has physical part holes)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(donut, has physical part hole)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(bagel, have hole in middle)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(donut, has physical part hole)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(bagel, have holes in middle)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(donut, has physical part hole)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(bagel, have in holes)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(donut, has physical part hole)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(bagel, has physical part hole)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(bagel, has physical part hole)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(donut, has physical part hole)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(bagel, has physical part holes)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(bagel, has physical part holes)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(donut, has physical part hole)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(bagel, have in holes)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(bagel, have in holes)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(donut, has physical part hole)
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(bagel, have hole in middle)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(bagel, have hole in middle)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(donut, has physical part hole)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(bagel, have holes in middle)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(bagel, have holes in middle)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(donut, has physical part hole)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(donut, has physical part hole)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(donut, has physical part hole)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(donut, be has hole)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(donut, has physical part hole)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(donut, be has hole)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(donut, has physical part hole)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(donut, be has hole)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(donut, has physical part hole)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(donut, be has hole)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(donut, has physical part hole)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(donut, have hole in middle)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(donut, has physical part hole)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(donut, has physical part hole)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(donut, has physical part hole)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(donut, has physical part hole)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(donut, has physical part hole)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(donut, has physical part hole)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(bagel, has physical part hole)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(donut, has physical part hole)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(bagel, has physical part holes)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(donut, has physical part hole)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(bagel, have in holes)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(donut, has physical part hole)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(bagel, have hole in middle)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(donut, has physical part hole)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(bagel, have holes in middle)