double: get paid

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents hit
Weight: 0.60
, grand slam
Weight: 0.58
, home run
Weight: 0.54
, day
Weight: 0.51
Siblings takeout
Weight: 0.36
, triple
Weight: 0.36
, single
Weight: 0.33
, homer
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
get paid 1.00
get paid less 0.93
pay more taxes 0.78
pay taxes 0.77
pay higher taxes 0.77
get taxed more 0.76
get taxed 0.75
afford here rent 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(double, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(single, pay more taxes)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(double, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(single, pay taxes)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(double, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(single, pay higher taxes)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(double, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(single, get taxed more)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(double, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(single, get taxed)
...

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(double, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(single, pay more taxes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(single, pay more taxes)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(double, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(single, pay taxes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(single, pay taxes)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(double, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(single, pay higher taxes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(single, pay higher taxes)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(double, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(single, get taxed more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(single, get taxed more)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(double, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(single, get taxed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(single, get taxed)
...

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(double, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(double, get paid)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(double, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(double, get paid less)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(double, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(double, get paid less)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(double, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(double, get paid less)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(double, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(double, get paid less)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(double, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(double, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(double, get paid)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(double, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(double, get paid)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(double, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(single, pay taxes)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(double, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(single, pay more taxes)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(double, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(single, get taxed)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(double, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(single, pay higher taxes)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(double, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(single, get taxed more)
...