double: has quality standard

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents hit
Weight: 0.60
, grand slam
Weight: 0.58
, home run
Weight: 0.54
, day
Weight: 0.51
Siblings takeout
Weight: 0.36
, triple
Weight: 0.36
, single
Weight: 0.33
, homer
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality standard 1.00
is quality 0.86
is competitive standard 0.85
has quality good 0.83
has quality better 0.83
has quality bad 0.81
is bad quality 0.79
is low quality 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(day, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(double, has quality standard)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(hit, is low quality)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(double, has quality standard)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(hit, is quality)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(double, has quality standard)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(day, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(double, has quality standard)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(double, has quality standard)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(day, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(double, has quality standard)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(hit, is quality)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(double, has quality standard)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(day, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(double, has quality standard)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(hit, is low quality)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(double, has quality standard)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(day, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(double, has quality standard)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(hit, is low quality)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(double, has quality standard)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(hit, is quality)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(double, has quality standard)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(day, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(double, has quality standard)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(single, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(double, has quality standard)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(single, has quality better)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(double, has quality standard)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(triple, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(double, has quality standard)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(triple, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(double, has quality standard)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(takeout, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(day, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(double, has quality standard)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(double, has quality standard)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(hit, is quality)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(double, has quality standard)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(double, has quality standard)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(hit, is low quality)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(double, has quality standard)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(double, has quality standard)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(day, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(double, has quality standard)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(double, has quality standard)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(double, has quality standard)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(takeout, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(takeout, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(double, has quality standard)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(single, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(single, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(double, has quality standard)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(triple, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(triple, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(double, has quality standard)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(triple, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(triple, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(double, has quality standard)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(single, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(single, has quality better)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(double, has quality standard)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(double, has quality standard)

Similarity expansion

0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(double, has quality standard)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(double, is competitive standard)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(double, has quality standard)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(double, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(double, has quality standard)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(double, is competitive standard)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(double, has quality standard)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(double, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(double, has quality standard)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(double, is competitive standard)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(double, has quality standard)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(double, is competitive standard)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(double, has quality standard)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(double, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(double, has quality standard)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(double, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(double, has quality standard)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(double, has quality standard)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(double, has quality standard)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(double, has quality standard)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(double, has quality standard)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(double, has quality standard)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(hit, is quality)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(double, has quality standard)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(day, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(double, has quality standard)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(day, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(double, has quality standard)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(hit, is low quality)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(double, has quality standard)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(single, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(double, has quality standard)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(takeout, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(double, has quality standard)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(triple, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(double, has quality standard)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(single, has quality better)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(double, has quality standard)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(triple, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(double, has quality standard)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(hit, is quality)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(double, has quality standard)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(day, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(double, has quality standard)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(day, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(double, has quality standard)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(hit, is low quality)