draft: be bad for birds

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents document
Weight: 0.65
, option
Weight: 0.58
, issue
Weight: 0.56
, proposal
Weight: 0.56
Siblings typescript
Weight: 0.46
, amendment
Weight: 0.32
, declaration
Weight: 0.32
, blueprint
Weight: 0.32
, manuscript
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for birds 1.00
kill birds 0.90
be bad for dogs 0.80
be bad for babies 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(draft, be bad for birds)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(draft, be bad for birds)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(draft, be bad for birds)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(draft, kill birds)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(draft, be bad for birds)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(draft, kill birds)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(draft, be bad for birds)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(draft, be bad for babies)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(draft, be bad for birds)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(draft, be bad for babies)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(draft, be bad for birds)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(draft, be bad for babies)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(draft, be bad for birds)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(draft, kill birds)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(draft, be bad for birds)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(draft, kill birds)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(draft, be bad for birds)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(draft, be bad for babies)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(draft, be bad for birds)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(draft, be bad for dogs)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(draft, be bad for birds)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(draft, be bad for dogs)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(draft, be bad for birds)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(draft, be bad for dogs)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(draft, be bad for birds)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(draft, be bad for dogs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(draft, be bad for birds)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(draft, be bad for birds)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(draft, be bad for birds)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(draft, be bad for birds)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(draft, be bad for birds)