draft: be bad for dogs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents document
Weight: 0.65
, option
Weight: 0.58
, issue
Weight: 0.56
, proposal
Weight: 0.56
Siblings typescript
Weight: 0.46
, amendment
Weight: 0.32
, declaration
Weight: 0.32
, blueprint
Weight: 0.32
, manuscript
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for dogs 1.00
be bad for birds 0.80
be bad for babies 0.80
is horse breeds 0.77
be with pugs 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(issue, be with pugs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(draft, be bad for dogs)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(draft, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(issue, be with pugs)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(draft, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(issue, be with pugs)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(issue, be with pugs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(draft, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(draft, be bad for dogs)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(draft, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(draft, be bad for dogs)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(draft, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(draft, be bad for babies)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(draft, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(draft, be bad for babies)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(draft, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(draft, be bad for babies)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(draft, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(draft, is horse breeds)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(draft, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(draft, is horse breeds)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(draft, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(draft, is horse breeds)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(draft, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(draft, be bad for babies)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(draft, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(draft, be bad for birds)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(draft, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(draft, is horse breeds)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(draft, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(draft, be bad for birds)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(draft, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(draft, be bad for birds)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(draft, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(draft, be bad for birds)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(draft, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(draft, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(draft, be bad for dogs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(draft, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(draft, be bad for dogs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(draft, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(issue, be with pugs)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(draft, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(issue, be with pugs)