drive: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.64
, hit
Weight: 0.61
, quality
Weight: 0.61
, movie
Weight: 0.59
Siblings hard drive
Weight: 0.78
, disk drive
Weight: 0.75
, driver
Weight: 0.33
, fast car
Weight: 0.33
, hard work
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality full 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(movie, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(drive, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(quality, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(drive, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(drive, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(quality, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(drive, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(movie, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(drive, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(movie, has quality good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(drive, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(quality, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(drive, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(drive, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(hard work, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(drive, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, has quality full)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(movie, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(drive, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(drive, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(quality, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(drive, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(drive, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(drive, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(hard work, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(hard work, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(drive, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(hard drive, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(hard drive, has quality good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(drive, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(hard drive, has quality full)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(hard drive, has quality full)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(drive, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(drive, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(drive, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(drive, has quality full)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(drive, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(drive, has quality full)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(drive, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(drive, has quality full)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(drive, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(drive, has quality full)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(drive, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(drive, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(drive, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(drive, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(drive, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(drive, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(quality, has quality good)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(drive, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(movie, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(drive, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(hard work, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(drive, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(hard drive, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(drive, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(hard drive, has quality full)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(drive, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(quality, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(drive, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(movie, has quality good)