hard drive: has quality full

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents disk drive
Weight: 0.79
, drive
Weight: 0.78
, computer disk
Weight: 0.68
, computer hardware
Weight: 0.67
Siblings floppy disk
Weight: 0.66
, save
Weight: 0.52
, flash memory
Weight: 0.34
, laptop computer
Weight: 0.34
, personal computer
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality full 1.00
has quality good 0.84
has quality better 0.83
has quality bad 0.80
is full all sudden 0.77
is full all of sudden 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.65
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(drive, has quality full) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(hard drive, has quality full)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(drive, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(hard drive, has quality full)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(disk drive, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(hard drive, has quality full)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(disk drive, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(hard drive, has quality full)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(drive, is full all of sudden) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(hard drive, has quality full)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(hard drive, has quality full) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(drive, has quality full)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(hard drive, has quality full) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(drive, is full all of sudden)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(hard drive, has quality full) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(drive, has quality good)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(hard drive, has quality full) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(disk drive, has quality bad)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(hard drive, has quality full) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(disk drive, has quality better)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, has quality full) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(drive, has quality full)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, has quality full) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(drive, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, has quality full) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(disk drive, has quality better)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, has quality full) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(disk drive, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, has quality full) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(drive, is full all of sudden)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, has quality full) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(flash memory, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(drive, has quality full) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(hard drive, has quality full) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(hard drive, has quality full)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(drive, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(hard drive, has quality full) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(hard drive, has quality full)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(disk drive, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(hard drive, has quality full) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(hard drive, has quality full)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(disk drive, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(hard drive, has quality full) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(hard drive, has quality full)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(drive, is full all of sudden) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(hard drive, has quality full) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(hard drive, has quality full)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(hard drive, has quality full) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(flash memory, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(flash memory, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(hard drive, has quality full) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(hard drive, has quality full)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(hard drive, has quality full) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(hard drive, has quality full) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(hard drive, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(hard drive, has quality full) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(hard drive, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(hard drive, has quality full) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(hard drive, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(hard drive, has quality full) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(hard drive, has quality full) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, has quality full)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(hard drive, has quality full) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(hard drive, has quality full)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, has quality full) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(drive, has quality full)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, has quality full) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(drive, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, has quality full) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(disk drive, has quality better)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, has quality full) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(disk drive, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, has quality full) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(drive, is full all of sudden)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, has quality full) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(flash memory, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(hard drive, has quality full) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(drive, has quality full)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(hard drive, has quality full) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(drive, has quality good)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(hard drive, has quality full) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(drive, is full all of sudden)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(hard drive, has quality full) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(disk drive, has quality better)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(hard drive, has quality full) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(disk drive, has quality bad)