drought: be considered disaster

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents emergency
Weight: 0.64
, crisis
Weight: 0.63
, stress
Weight: 0.60
, event
Weight: 0.58
, bad weather
Weight: 0.58
Siblings flood
Weight: 0.34
, situation
Weight: 0.32
, rain
Weight: 0.32
, overpopulation
Weight: 0.32
, global warming
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered disaster 1.00
be considered natural disaster 0.96
has state disaster 0.93
is natural disaster 0.92
is natural disasters 0.85
is taken less seriously than other natural disasters 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(drought, be considered disaster)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(flood, has state disaster)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(drought, be considered disaster)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(flood, is natural disaster)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(drought, be considered disaster)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(flood, is natural disaster)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(flood, is natural disaster)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(drought, be considered disaster)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(flood, has state disaster)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(flood, has state disaster)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(drought, be considered disaster)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(drought, be considered disaster)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(drought, be considered disaster)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(drought, be considered natural disaster)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(drought, be considered disaster)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(drought, has state disaster)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(drought, be considered disaster)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(drought, is natural disaster)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(drought, be considered disaster)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(drought, is natural disaster)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(drought, be considered disaster)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(drought, is natural disasters)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(drought, be considered disaster)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(drought, has state disaster)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(drought, be considered disaster)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(drought, is taken less seriously than other natural disasters)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(drought, be considered disaster)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(drought, is natural disaster)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(drought, be considered disaster)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(drought, is natural disaster)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(drought, be considered disaster)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(drought, has state disaster)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(drought, be considered disaster)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(drought, be considered natural disaster)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(drought, be considered disaster)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(drought, has state disaster)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(drought, be considered disaster)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(drought, is natural disasters)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(drought, be considered disaster)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(drought, be considered natural disaster)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(drought, be considered disaster)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(drought, be considered natural disaster)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(drought, be considered disaster)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(drought, is natural disasters)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(drought, be considered disaster)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(drought, is natural disasters)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(drought, be considered disaster)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(drought, is taken less seriously than other natural disasters)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(drought, be considered disaster)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(drought, is taken less seriously than other natural disasters)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(drought, be considered disaster)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(drought, is taken less seriously than other natural disasters)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(drought, be considered disaster)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(drought, be considered disaster)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(drought, be considered disaster)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(drought, be considered disaster)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(drought, be considered disaster)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(drought, be considered disaster)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(flood, is natural disaster)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(drought, be considered disaster)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(flood, has state disaster)