drought: has state disaster

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents emergency
Weight: 0.64
, crisis
Weight: 0.63
, stress
Weight: 0.60
, event
Weight: 0.58
, bad weather
Weight: 0.58
Siblings flood
Weight: 0.34
, situation
Weight: 0.32
, rain
Weight: 0.32
, overpopulation
Weight: 0.32
, global warming
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state disaster 1.00
be considered disaster 0.93
is natural disaster 0.92
be considered natural disaster 0.90
is natural disasters 0.84
is taken less seriously than other natural disasters 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(drought, has state disaster)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(flood, has state disaster)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(drought, has state disaster)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(flood, is natural disaster)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(drought, has state disaster)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(flood, has state disaster)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(flood, has state disaster)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(drought, has state disaster)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(flood, is natural disaster)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(flood, is natural disaster)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(drought, has state disaster)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(drought, has state disaster)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(drought, has state disaster)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(drought, be considered disaster)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(drought, has state disaster)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(drought, is natural disaster)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(drought, has state disaster)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(drought, be considered disaster)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(drought, has state disaster)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(drought, is natural disaster)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(drought, has state disaster)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(drought, be considered natural disaster)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(drought, has state disaster)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(drought, is natural disasters)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(drought, has state disaster)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(drought, is natural disaster)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(drought, has state disaster)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(drought, is taken less seriously than other natural disasters)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(drought, has state disaster)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(drought, be considered disaster)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(drought, has state disaster)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(drought, is natural disasters)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(drought, has state disaster)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(drought, is natural disaster)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(drought, has state disaster)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(drought, be considered disaster)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(drought, has state disaster)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(drought, be considered natural disaster)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(drought, has state disaster)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(drought, be considered natural disaster)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(drought, has state disaster)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(drought, is natural disasters)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(drought, has state disaster)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(drought, is natural disasters)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(drought, has state disaster)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(drought, be considered natural disaster)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(drought, has state disaster)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(drought, is taken less seriously than other natural disasters)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(drought, has state disaster)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(drought, is taken less seriously than other natural disasters)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(drought, has state disaster)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(drought, is taken less seriously than other natural disasters)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(drought, has state disaster)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(drought, has state disaster)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(drought, has state disaster)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(drought, has state disaster)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(drought, has state disaster)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(drought, has state disaster)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(flood, is natural disaster)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(drought, has state disaster)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(flood, has state disaster)