drought: be considered natural disaster

Property	Similarity
be considered natural disaster	1.00
is natural disaster	0.98
be considered disaster	0.96
is natural disasters	0.92
has state disaster	0.90
is natural	0.86
is taken less seriously than other natural disasters	0.84

0.78

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.32

Typical(drought, be considered natural disaster) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Typical(drought, is natural disaster)

0.76

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.32

Typical(drought, be considered natural disaster) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Typical(drought, be considered disaster)

0.76

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.90

Remarkable(drought, be considered natural disaster) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(drought, is natural disaster)

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.90

Remarkable(drought, be considered natural disaster) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Remarkable(drought, be considered disaster)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.90

Remarkable(drought, be considered natural disaster) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Remarkable(drought, is natural)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.90

Remarkable(drought, be considered natural disaster) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(drought, is natural disasters)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.71

Salient(drought, be considered natural disaster) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Salient(drought, is natural)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.90

Remarkable(drought, be considered natural disaster) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(drought, has state disaster)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.49

Plausible(drought, be considered natural disaster) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Plausible(drought, is natural disaster)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.71

Salient(drought, be considered natural disaster) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Salient(drought, is natural disaster)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.49

Plausible(drought, be considered natural disaster) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Plausible(drought, is natural)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.32

Typical(drought, be considered natural disaster) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Typical(drought, is natural disasters)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.32

Typical(drought, be considered natural disaster) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Typical(drought, has state disaster)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.90

Remarkable(drought, be considered natural disaster) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(drought, is taken less seriously than other natural disasters)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.49

Plausible(drought, be considered natural disaster) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Plausible(drought, be considered disaster)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.71

Salient(drought, be considered natural disaster) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Salient(drought, be considered disaster)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.71

Salient(drought, be considered natural disaster) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Salient(drought, is natural disasters)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.71

Salient(drought, be considered natural disaster) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Salient(drought, has state disaster)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.49

Plausible(drought, be considered natural disaster) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Plausible(drought, is natural disasters)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.49

Plausible(drought, be considered natural disaster) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Plausible(drought, has state disaster)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.32

Typical(drought, be considered natural disaster) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Typical(drought, is natural)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.71

Salient(drought, be considered natural disaster) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Salient(drought, is taken less seriously than other natural disasters)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.49

Plausible(drought, be considered natural disaster) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Plausible(drought, is taken less seriously than other natural disasters)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.32

Typical(drought, be considered natural disaster) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Typical(drought, is taken less seriously than other natural disasters)

Parents	emergency Weight: 0.64 , crisis Weight: 0.63 , stress Weight: 0.60 , event Weight: 0.58 , bad weather Weight: 0.58
Siblings	flood Weight: 0.34 , situation Weight: 0.32 , rain Weight: 0.32 , overpopulation Weight: 0.32 , global warming Weight: 0.32

drought: be considered natural disaster

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings